Goerres G, Altermatt M, Müller-Brand J, Tyndall A, Theiler R
Departement Radiologie, Rheumatologische Universitatsklinik Kantonsspital Basel.
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1998 Aug 26;87(35):1089-95.
In this study, 96 women (mean +/- SD, 65.3 +/- 13.2 years) were investigated by bone mineral densitometry (DXA, Hologic QDR 2000) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the tibia (n = 96; Sound-Scan2000, Myriad) and phalanges (n = 84: DBM Sonic 1200, IGEA). We observed a good correlation of QUS measurement with bone mineral content (BMD) on lumbar spine and both hips (Ward and Neck). Correlation of the two QUS-techniques measuring at different skeletal sites within the same patient was good. QUS instruments measuring at the various skeletal sites and their suitability for screening patients at risk of osteoporosis are discussed. The usefulness of the different QUS methods and the best measuring site for the assessment of fracture risk in osteoporotic patients still have to be established.
在本研究中,对96名女性(平均年龄±标准差,65.3±13.2岁)进行了骨密度测量(双能X线吸收法,Hologic QDR 2000)以及胫骨(n = 96;Sound-Scan2000,Myriad)和指骨(n = 84:DBM Sonic 1200,IGEA)的定量超声检查。我们观察到定量超声测量结果与腰椎和双髋(沃德三角区和股骨颈)的骨矿物质含量(骨密度)具有良好的相关性。同一患者不同骨骼部位的两种定量超声技术之间的相关性良好。讨论了在不同骨骼部位进行测量的定量超声仪器及其对骨质疏松症高危患者筛查的适用性。不同定量超声方法的实用性以及评估骨质疏松症患者骨折风险的最佳测量部位仍有待确定。