Carpenter J S, Andrykowski M A, Wilson J, Hall L A, Rayens M K, Sachs B, Cunningham L L
Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40536-0086, USA.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1998 Sep-Oct;19(5):481-94. doi: 10.1080/016128498248917.
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D; L. S. Radloff, 1977) assesses the presence and severity of depressive symptoms occurring over the past week. Although it contains only 20 items, its length may preclude its use in a variety of clinical populations. This study evaluated psychometric properties of 2 shorter forms of the CES-D developed by F. J. Kohout, L. F. Berkman, D. A. Evans, and J. Cornoni-Huntley (1993): the Iowa form and the Boston form. Data were pooled from 832 women representing 6 populations. Internal consistency estimates, correlations with the original version of the CES-D, and omitted-included item correlations supported use of the Iowa form over the Boston form when a shortened version of the scale is desired. Regression statistics are provided for use in estimating scores on the original CES-D when either shortened form is used. Factor analytic results from two populations support a single-factor structure for the original CES-D as well as the short forms.
流行病学研究中心抑郁量表（CES-D；L. S. 拉德洛夫，1977年）评估过去一周内出现的抑郁症状及其严重程度。尽管它仅包含20个条目，但其长度可能使其无法用于各种临床人群。本研究评估了由F. J. 科胡特、L. F. 伯克曼、D. A. 埃文斯和J. 科尔诺尼-亨特利（1993年）开发的CES-D的两种较短形式的心理测量特性：爱荷华形式和波士顿形式。数据来自代表6个人群的832名女性。当需要缩短版量表时，内部一致性估计、与CES-D原始版本的相关性以及省略-包含项目相关性支持使用爱荷华形式而非波士顿形式。提供了回归统计数据，用于在使用任何一种缩短形式时估计原始CES-D的分数。来自两个人群的因素分析结果支持原始CES-D以及简短形式的单因素结构。
