Suppr超能文献

头孢克肟与氯霉素治疗儿童伤寒的对比研究。

A comparative study of cefixime and chloramphenicol in children with typhoid fever.

作者信息

Malik M S, Iqbal I, Rabbani W

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Nishtar Medical College, Multan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 1998 Apr;48(4):106-7.

PMID:9783046
Abstract

We compared cefixime with chloramphenicol in a randomized trial for treatment of children with culture positive typhoid fever. Twenty children were given cefixime 10 mg/kg/day orally and twenty received chloramphenicol 50 mg/kg/day orally. On entry in the study, the clinical characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Duration of therapy was 14 days. Clinical cure was observed in 18 (90%) patients treated with cefixime and 9 (45%) treated with chloramphenical. Out of the 11 patients who did not respond to chloramphenicol, 10 were switched over to cefixime and all of them were cured. Over all 28 cases out of 30 (93.3%) P = 0.0049 were cured by cefixime.

摘要

我们在一项随机试验中比较了头孢克肟与氯霉素治疗培养确诊为伤寒热儿童的疗效。20名儿童口服头孢克肟,剂量为10mg/kg/天,另外20名儿童口服氯霉素,剂量为50mg/kg/天。在研究开始时,两组的临床特征具有可比性。治疗持续时间为14天。接受头孢克肟治疗的18名(90%)患者和接受氯霉素治疗的9名(45%)患者观察到临床治愈。在11名对氯霉素无反应的患者中,10名转而使用头孢克肟,所有这些患者均被治愈。总体而言,30例中有28例(93.3%)通过头孢克肟治愈,P=0.0049。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验