• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

间隙保持器的使用寿命:一项回顾性研究。

The longevity of space maintainers: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Qudeimat M A, Fayle S A

机构信息

Department of Child Dental Health, Leeds University, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 1998 Jul-Aug;20(4):267-72.

PMID:9783298
Abstract

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated the longevity of 301 space maintainers fitted in 141 patients aged 3.4-22.1 years in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at Leeds Dental Institute between 1991 and 1995.

RESULTS

Failure occurred in 190 space maintainers (63%), of which 36% were due to cement loss, 24% breakage, 10% design problems, and 9% were lost. Using the life table method, the median survival time (MST) for space maintainers was found to be 7 months. Band and loop (B&L) appliances had the highest MST of 13 months, while the lower lingual holding arch (LLHA) had the lowest of 4 months. Unilateral space maintainers survived longer than bilateral space maintainers (MST of 13 months vs. 5 months). Left B&Ls had a MST of 16 months, compared to only 4 months for right B&Ls, Gender, age, arch in which the appliance was placed, the operator planning it, fixed vs. removable, and adequacy of pretreatment assessment did not have a significant effect on survival time.

摘要

方法

这项回顾性研究调查了1991年至1995年间在利兹牙科研究所儿童牙科为141名年龄在3.4至22.1岁的患者安装的301个间隙保持器的使用寿命。

结果

190个间隙保持器(63%)出现故障,其中36%是由于粘固剂脱落,24%是破损,10%是设计问题,9%是丢失。采用寿命表法,间隙保持器的中位生存时间(MST)为7个月。带环和圈簧(B&L)矫治器的MST最高,为13个月,而下颌舌弓(LLHA)矫治器的MST最低,为4个月。单侧间隙保持器的存活时间比双侧间隙保持器长(MST分别为13个月和5个月)。左侧B&L矫治器的MST为16个月,而右侧B&L矫治器仅为4个月。性别、年龄、矫治器放置的牙弓、计划放置的操作者、固定与活动矫治器以及治疗前评估的充分性对生存时间均无显著影响。

相似文献

1
The longevity of space maintainers: a retrospective study.间隙保持器的使用寿命:一项回顾性研究。
Pediatr Dent. 1998 Jul-Aug;20(4):267-72.
2
Clinical performance and survival of space maintainers: evaluation over a period of 5 years.间隙保持器的临床性能与生存率:5年评估期
ASDC J Dent Child. 2002 May-Aug;69(2):156-60, 124.
3
An evaluation of survival of space maintainers: a six-year follow-up study.间隙保持器留存情况评估:一项为期六年的随访研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005 Feb 15;6(1):74-84.
4
The use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department.英国一家儿科牙科部门对间隙保持器的使用情况。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1999 Nov-Dec;66(6):383-6.
5
Laboratory-made space maintainers: a 7-year retrospective study from private pediatric dental practice.实验室制作的间隙保持器:一项来自私人儿科牙科诊所的7年回顾性研究。
Pediatr Dent. 2007 Nov-Dec;29(6):500-6.
6
Bilateral space maintainers: a 7-year retrospective study from private practice.双侧间隙保持器:一项来自私人诊所的7年回顾性研究。
Pediatr Dent. 2006 Nov-Dec;28(6):499-505.
7
Survival of different types of space maintainers.不同类型间隙保持器的留存情况。
Pediatr Dent. 1994 Sep-Oct;16(5):360-1.
8
Space maintenance in the primary and mixed dentition.乳牙列和混合牙列期的间隙保持
Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2000 Oct;15:203-5.
9
Clinical success and longevity of band and loop compared to crown and loop space maintainers.与带环及环式间隙保持器相比,带环和圈形间隙保持器的临床成功率及使用寿命。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Oct;16(5):391-6. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0183-y. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
Success of reinforced fiber material space maintainers.增强纤维材料间隙保持器的成功率。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 May-Aug;71(2):158-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovations in Band and Loop Space Maintainers: Transition From Conventional to Advanced.带环和环式间隙保持器的创新:从传统到先进的转变
Cureus. 2025 Jun 2;17(6):e85234. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85234. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Clinical Evaluation of Different Designs of Fixed Space Maintainer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.不同设计的固定间隙保持器的临床评估:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;17(4):442-450. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2835.
3
Three-dimensional Printed Esthetic Innovative Space Maintainer for Children with ADHD: Short Communication.
用于多动症儿童的三维打印美学创新型间隙保持器:简短通讯
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov-Dec;16(6):908-910. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2717.
4
Clinical Effectiveness of Fiber-reinforced Composite Space Maintainer and Band and Loop Space Maintainer in a Pediatric Patient: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.纤维增强复合间隙保持器和带环丝圈式间隙保持器在儿科患者中的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S82-S93. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2044.
5
Digitainers-Digital Space Maintainers: A Review.数字化保持器——数字空间维持器:综述
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S69-S75. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2040.
6
Comparison of the Conventional Band and Loop Space Maintainers with Modified Space Maintainers: A Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.传统带环式和环式间隙保持器与改良间隙保持器的比较:一项半口随机临床试验。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S63-S68. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2046.
7
Functional Band and Loop Space Maintainers in Children.儿童功能性带环及带圈间隙保持器
Case Rep Dent. 2019 Apr 24;2019:4312049. doi: 10.1155/2019/4312049. eCollection 2019.
8
Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - A systematic review.儿童牙科中使用的不同固定式后牙间隙保持器的存活率——一项系统评价。
Saudi Dent J. 2019 Apr;31(2):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.037. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
Survival of Bonded Space Maintainers: A Systematic Review.粘结式间隙保持器的留存率:一项系统评价
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):440-445. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1554. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
10
Methods of space maintenance for premature loss of a primary molar: a review.乳磨牙早失的间隙保持方法:综述
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Oct;19(5):311-320. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0357-5. Epub 2018 Sep 5.