• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

惩教机构中的管理式行为医疗保健。

Managed behavioral healthcare in correctional settings.

作者信息

Patterson R F

机构信息

Forensic Services, District of Columbia Commission on Mental Health Services, Washington 20032, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1998;26(3):467-73.

PMID:9785289
Abstract

This paper alerts practitioners and administrators in correctional healthcare settings to a variety of issues of concern when advising or negotiating with state or county governments on the provision of managed behavioral healthcare. The participation of the mental health practitioner or administrator involved in determining the quality and appropriateness of behavioral managed care contractual services is an essential component of an overall healthcare service in a correctional setting. Several crucial elements are outlined relative to correctional settings, including the interface between custody and treatment providers, crisis intervention for incoming detainees or inmates, and provision of services for longer term "no parole" inmates in correctional settings. A number of considerations are reviewed, including (1) staffing, (2) drug formularies, (3) levels of service, and (4) "hidden costs," that may influence contractual negotiations as well as service provision by managed behavioral healthcare companies in correctional settings.

摘要

本文提醒惩教医疗环境中的从业者和管理人员,在就提供管理式行为医疗保健与州或县政府进行咨询或谈判时,要关注各种相关问题。参与确定行为管理式护理合同服务质量和适宜性的心理健康从业者或管理人员,是惩教环境中整体医疗服务的重要组成部分。文中概述了与惩教环境相关的几个关键要素,包括监管人员与治疗提供者之间的衔接、对新收押的被拘留者或囚犯的危机干预,以及为惩教环境中“无假释可能”的长期囚犯提供服务。文中还审视了一些可能影响合同谈判以及管理式行为医疗保健公司在惩教环境中提供服务的因素,包括:(1)人员配备;(2)药品处方集;(3)服务水平;(4)“隐性成本”。

相似文献

1
Managed behavioral healthcare in correctional settings.惩教机构中的管理式行为医疗保健。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1998;26(3):467-73.
2
The impact of managed behavorial healthcare on the costs of psychiatric and chemical dependency treatment.管理式行为医疗保健对精神疾病和药物依赖治疗成本的影响。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1994 Mar-Apr;3(2):18-30.
3
An analysis of contracts for the delivery of managed behavioral health care services in state correctional facilities.
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Feb(15-16):1-49.
4
Access point analysis on the state of health care services in South African prisons: a qualitative exploration of correctional health care workers' and inmates' perspectives in Kwazulu-Natal and Mpumalanga.南非监狱医疗服务状况的接入点分析:夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省和姆普马兰加省惩教医护人员及囚犯观点的质性探索
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Nov;63(9):2301-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.010. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
5
The implementation of managed behavioral healthcare in Colorado and the effects on older Medicaid beneficiaries.科罗拉多州管理式行为医疗保健的实施及其对老年医疗补助受益人的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006 Mar;9(1):15-24.
6
Correctional treatment for co-occurring disorders: results of a national survey.共病障碍的矫正治疗:一项全国性调查的结果。
Behav Sci Law. 2004;22(4):563-84. doi: 10.1002/bsl.607.
7
Seven principles of healthcare reform. American Managed Behavioral Healthcare Association.医疗保健改革的七项原则。美国管理行为医疗保健协会。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1994 Mar-Apr;3(2):80, 78-9.
8
Public substance abuse and managed behavioral healthcare. American Managed Behavioral Healthcare Association and National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors, Inc.公共药物滥用与管理式行为医疗保健。美国管理式行为医疗保健协会与全国州酒精和药物滥用主任协会
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1999 Feb;8(1):25-30.
9
Resource document on the use of restraint and seclusion in correctional mental health care.惩教心理健康护理中约束和隔离使用的资源文件。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(4):417-25.
10
An analysis of the effects of organization and financing on the utilization and costs of public mental health services in san diego county.圣地亚哥县公共心理健康服务的组织与融资对服务利用及成本的影响分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Sep;10(3):123-32.