Burton R P
Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA.
J Health Soc Behav. 1998 Sep;39(3):201-15.
Previous scholars' attempts to account for the salutary effects of social roles (i.e., employment, marriage, and parenting) on distress have considered the mediating effects of role-specific identity meaning. These attempts, however, have had limited success. I argue that social roles affect distress because they provide a global integrative meaning and that this integrative concept of meaning is theoretically different from role-specific identity meaning. My data were drawn from a national probability sample of 2,248 respondents age 18 years and over. My results provide substantial evidence that social roles have a salutary relationship on distress and that integrative meaning mediates these effects. The effects of the marriage and parenting roles on distress are the most affected by the mediating effects of integrative meaning. My discussion addresses these findings in light of recent research which considers other theoretically important and potentially related constructs such as role-specific identity meaning, global self-esteem and role-specific self-esteem.
以往学者试图解释社会角色(即就业、婚姻和为人父母)对痛苦的有益影响时,考虑了特定角色身份意义的中介作用。然而,这些尝试取得的成功有限。我认为社会角色会影响痛苦,因为它们提供了一种全局整合意义,而且这种意义的整合概念在理论上不同于特定角色身份意义。我的数据来自一个全国概率样本,样本包含2248名18岁及以上的受访者。我的研究结果提供了大量证据,表明社会角色与痛苦之间存在有益关系,且整合意义在其中起到中介作用。婚姻和为人父母角色对痛苦的影响受整合意义中介作用的影响最大。我的讨论结合了近期的研究来阐述这些发现,这些研究考虑了其他在理论上重要且可能相关的概念,如特定角色身份意义、全局自尊和特定角色自尊。