Azzopardi P, Cowey A
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK.
Conscious Cogn. 1998 Sep;7(3):292-311. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1998.0358.
Some patients with damaged striate cortex have blindsight-the ability to discriminate unseen stimuli in their clinically blind visual field defects when forced-choice procedures are used. Blindsight implies a sharp dissociation between visual performance and visual awareness, but signal detection theory indicates that it might be indistinguishable from the behavior of normal subjects near the lower limit of conscious vision, where the dissociations could arise trivially from using different response criteria during clinical and forced-choice tests. We tested the latter possibility with a hemianopic subject during yes-no and forced-choice detection of static and moving targets. His response criterion differed significantly between yes-no and forced-choice responding, and the difference was sufficient to produce a blindsight-like dissociation with bias-sensitive measures of performance. When measured independently of bias, his sensitivity to static targets was greater in the forced-choice than in the yes-no task (unlike normal control subjects), but his sensitivity to moving targets did not differ. Differences in response criterion could therefore account for dissociations between yes-no and forced-choice detection of motion, but not of static pattern. The results explain why patients with blindsight are apparently more often "aware" of moving stimuli than of static stimuli. However, they also imply that blindsight is unlike normal vision near threshold, and that pattern- and motion-detection in blindsight may depend on different sets of neural mechanisms during yes-no and forced-choice tests.
一些纹状皮质受损的患者具有盲视能力——即在使用迫选程序时,能够在其临床失明的视野缺损区域辨别未被看到的刺激。盲视意味着视觉表现与视觉意识之间存在明显的分离,但信号检测理论表明,这可能与正常受试者在有意识视觉下限附近的行为难以区分,在这种情况下,这种分离可能仅仅是由于在临床测试和迫选测试中使用了不同的反应标准而产生的。我们对一名偏盲患者进行了测试,让他在是/否任务以及对静态和动态目标的迫选检测中做出反应。他在是/否反应和迫选反应之间的反应标准存在显著差异,并且这种差异足以通过对表现的偏差敏感测量产生类似盲视的分离。当独立于偏差进行测量时,他对静态目标的敏感度在迫选任务中比在是/否任务中更高(与正常对照受试者不同),但他对动态目标的敏感度没有差异。因此,反应标准的差异可以解释在对运动的是/否检测和迫选检测之间的分离,但不能解释对静态图案的分离。这些结果解释了为什么盲视患者似乎更常“意识到”动态刺激而非静态刺激。然而,它们也意味着盲视与接近阈值时的正常视觉不同,并且在是/否任务和迫选测试中,盲视中的图案检测和运动检测可能依赖于不同的神经机制集合。