Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada.
Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 15;58(2):605-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.081. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
Many imaging studies report activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortices when subjects are aware as opposed to unaware of visual stimuli. One possibility is that this activity simply reflects higher signal strength or the superior task performance that is associated with awareness. To find out, we studied the hemianope GY who has unilateral destruction of almost all primary visual cortices. He exhibits 'blindsight', that is, he claims to have no conscious visual phenomenology (i.e., no visual qualia), for stationary stimuli presented to his right visual field (the blind field), although he can press keys to distinguish between different stimuli presented there. We presented to him a visual discrimination task, and equated performance for stimuli presented to the left or right visual field by presenting low contrast stimuli to his normal (left) field and high contrast stimuli to his blind (right) field. Superior accuracy can be a serious confound, and our paradigm allows us to control for it and avoid this confound. Even when performance was matched, and the signal strength was lower, visual stimulation to the normal (conscious) field led to higher activity in the prefrontal and parietal cortices. These results indicate that the activity in the prefrontal and parietal areas that has been reported in previous studies of awareness is not just due to a (signal strength or performance) confounds. One possibility is that it reflects the superior 'metacognitive' capacity that is associated with awareness, because GY was better able to distinguish between his own correct and incorrect responses for stimuli presented to his normal field than to his blind field.
许多影像学研究报告称,当被试意识到视觉刺激而不是无意识时,前额叶和顶叶皮层会出现活动。一种可能性是,这种活动仅仅反映了更高的信号强度或与意识相关的更高的任务表现。为了找出答案,我们研究了半侧忽视症患者 GY,他的几乎所有初级视觉皮层都受到单侧破坏。他表现出“盲视”,也就是说,他声称对呈现给他的右视野(盲视野)的静止刺激没有有意识的视觉现象学(即没有视觉质),尽管他可以按键来区分呈现给他的不同刺激那里。我们向他呈现了一个视觉辨别任务,并通过向他的正常(左侧)视野呈现低对比度刺激,向他的盲侧(右侧)视野呈现高对比度刺激,来平衡呈现给他的左视野或右视野的刺激的表现。更高的准确性可能是一个严重的混杂因素,我们的范式允许我们控制它并避免这种混杂因素。即使表现匹配,并且信号强度较低,正常(有意识)视野的视觉刺激也会导致前额叶和顶叶皮层的活动增加。这些结果表明,之前关于意识的研究中报告的前额叶和顶叶区域的活动不仅仅是由于(信号强度或表现)混杂因素造成的。一种可能性是,它反映了与意识相关的更高的“元认知”能力,因为 GY 能够更好地区分他对正常视野呈现的刺激的正确和错误反应,而不是对盲视野呈现的刺激的正确和错误反应。