Brasche S, Witthauer J, Bischof W, Lee K, Spengler J D
Institut für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1998 Sep;201(3):229-39.
Measurements of NO2 exposure of 29 inhabitants of Erfurt were carried out using personal passive samplers along with stationary passive samplers (indoor and outdoor) at the subjects' apartments and at their work places. The time adjusted results of the stationary measurements were compared with the results of the personal measurements and the differences (mean: 3, 15; max: +47; min: 14, 1 in ppb) were analysed. A multitude of recorded facts (e.g. use of gas stoves, smoking in the apartment) and factors which could not be quantified (e.g under- or over-estimation of the real impact of the pollutant on the person) results in disparities between the personal and stationary measured data. Though people spent 90% of the 48 hours measurement period indoors, time weighted stationary measurements of NO2 cannot replace personal measurements. For evaluation of health problems, lack of well being and work efficiency personal measurements are preferable.
使用个人被动采样器以及在受试者公寓和工作场所设置的固定被动采样器（室内和室外），对爱尔福特的29名居民进行了二氧化氮暴露测量。将固定测量的时间调整结果与个人测量结果进行比较，并分析了两者之间的差异（平均值：3, 15；最大值：+47；最小值：14, 1，单位为ppb）。大量记录的事实（例如使用燃气灶具、在公寓内吸烟）以及无法量化的因素（例如污染物对人的实际影响被低估或高估）导致了个人测量数据和固定测量数据之间的差异。尽管人们在48小时测量期内90%的时间都待在室内，但二氧化氮的时间加权固定测量不能替代个人测量。对于评估健康问题、幸福感和工作效率，个人测量更可取。
