Suppr超能文献

[双眼视觉异常——微斜视分类原则(作者译)]

[Subnormal binocular vision -- principles for the classification of microstrabismus (author's transl)].

作者信息

de Decker W, Haase W

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1976 Aug;169(2):182-94.

PMID:979042
Abstract

The studies of several hundred case records, most of them carefully observed for years, show that a simple definition of microstrabismus is not sufficient. Contrary to usual opinions about correspondence problems 7% of these cases were even found to be corresponding normally. One third of the cases remained unstable in their sensory behavior. In our opinion combinations of 4 sensopathological prinicples allow a better description of the clinical findings in cases showing a more complicated state. The 4 prinicples are 1. haziness of cortical connections, 2. rivalry of more than one correspondence, 3. horror fusionis, 4. inherited amblyopia -- inborn lack of monocular capacity. Furthermore it can be demonstrated that the four prinicples match with recent findings in neurophysiology and neuroanatomy.

摘要

对数百份病例记录的研究(其中大多数都经过多年的仔细观察)表明,对微斜视的简单定义并不充分。与关于对应问题的通常观点相反,这些病例中有7%甚至被发现对应正常。三分之一的病例在感觉行为上不稳定。我们认为,四种感觉病理学原理的组合能够更好地描述表现出更复杂状态的病例的临床发现。这四种原理是:1. 皮质连接模糊;2. 多种对应关系的竞争;3. 融合恐惧;4. 遗传性弱视——先天性单眼功能缺失。此外,可以证明这四种原理与神经生理学和神经解剖学的最新发现相匹配。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验