• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

就国家口腔卫生研究议程达成共识:一项德尔菲研究。美国口腔卫生学家协会研究委员会。

Reaching consensus on the National Dental Hygiene Research Agenda: a Delphi study. American Dental Hygienists Association Council on Research.

作者信息

Forest J L, Lyons K J, Bross T M, Gitlin L N, Kraemer L G

机构信息

Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Allied Health Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Hyg. 1995 Nov-Dec;69(6):261-9.

PMID:9791237
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to achieve consensus on specific research topics under the national dental hygiene research agenda categories developed by the ADHA Council on Research.

METHODS

A Delphi technique was used to survey a group of 48 dental hygiene experts to gain consensus about the appropriateness of topics for dental hygiene research. The study was carried out in three phases: a development and pilot-testing phase and two rounds of mailed surveys. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Instrument reliability was analyzed using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient and Cronbach's Alpha for internal consistency.

RESULTS

Sixty-six topics reflective of the research agenda categories were identified through the first phase. Return rates of 100% and 94% were achieved for the two survey rounds. Instrument reliability was established at .91 and internal consistency at .94. After two rounds, consensus was reached on 37 of the 66 topics.

CONCLUSIONS

Each of the categories comprising the ADHA national dental hygiene research agenda was well represented by the 37 topics. This finding provided evidence that there was consensus on the national agenda. However, reaching consensus is just the first step in the development of a long-range plan to guide research efforts and to promote depth in the development of a body of knowledge based on scientific inquiry.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是就美国牙科保健协会研究委员会制定的国家牙科保健研究议程类别下的具体研究主题达成共识。

方法

采用德尔菲技术对48名牙科保健专家进行调查,以就牙科保健研究主题的适宜性达成共识。该研究分三个阶段进行:一个开发和预测试阶段以及两轮邮寄调查。使用描述性统计分析回复。使用皮尔逊积差相关系数和克朗巴哈系数分析工具的信度以评估内部一致性。

结果

通过第一阶段确定了66个反映研究议程类别的主题。两轮调查的回复率分别达到100%和94%。工具信度确定为0.91,内部一致性为0.94。两轮之后,66个主题中的37个达成了共识。

结论

构成美国牙科保健协会国家牙科保健研究议程的每个类别都在这37个主题中得到了充分体现。这一发现证明在国家议程上达成了共识。然而,达成共识只是制定长期计划的第一步,该计划旨在指导研究工作并促进基于科学探究的知识体系发展的深度。

相似文献

1
Reaching consensus on the National Dental Hygiene Research Agenda: a Delphi study. American Dental Hygienists Association Council on Research.就国家口腔卫生研究议程达成共识:一项德尔菲研究。美国口腔卫生学家协会研究委员会。
J Dent Hyg. 1995 Nov-Dec;69(6):261-9.
2
A Delphi study to update the American Dental Hygienists' National Dental Hygiene Research Agenda.一项用于更新美国牙科保健员全国牙科保健研究议程的德尔菲研究。
J Dent Hyg. 2009 Winter;83(1):18-32. Epub 2009 Jan 1.
3
Prioritization of the National Dental Hygiene Research Agenda.国家口腔卫生研究议程的优先排序
J Dent Hyg. 2002 Spring;76(2):157-66.
4
The American Dental Hygienists' Association national dental hygiene research agenda.美国牙科保健员协会全国牙科保健研究议程。
J Dent Hyg. 2009 Fall;83(4):159-60. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
5
A predictive study on the role and function of the dental hygienist in Taiwan.
Int J Dent Hyg. 2007 May;5(2):103-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00236.x.
6
Evidence-based decision making in dental hygiene education, practice, and research.口腔卫生保健教育、实践与研究中的循证决策
J Dent Hyg. 2001 Winter;75(1):50-63.
7
A defining time for dental hygiene.口腔卫生的关键时期。
J Dent Hyg. 2002 Spring;76(2):108-9.
8
The role of the student professional association in mentoring dental hygiene students for the future.学生专业协会在指导未来口腔卫生专业学生方面的作用。
J Dent Hyg. 2008 Winter;82(1):9. Epub 2008 Jan 1.
9
Dental hygiene and research: irrevocably connected.口腔卫生与研究:紧密相连,不可分割。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014 Jun;14 Suppl:227-34.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
10
ADHA's focus on advancing the profession: Minnesota's dental hygiene educators' response.美国牙科卫生员协会对推动该行业发展的关注:明尼苏达州牙科卫生教育工作者的回应。
J Dent Hyg. 2007 Spring;81(2):53. Epub 2007 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a national dental education research strategy: priorities, barriers and enablers.制定国家牙科教育研究战略:优先事项、障碍与推动因素
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e013129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013129.