Zimmermann M, Adamec R, Metzger J
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Oct;21(10):1949-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00015.x.
Little is known about the electrophysiological properties of the atrium predisposing to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in patients without structural heart disease. This study was conducted to analyze intraatrial conduction, atrial refractoriness, and arrhythmia inducibility in patients with lone paroxysmal AF. An electrophysiological study was performed in 24 patients with a documented history of lone paroxysmal AF but in sinus rhythm at the time of the electrophysiological study. Twelve patients without any history of atrial arrhythmias served as controls. The patients with lone paroxysmal AF showed a significant prolonged local conduction time S1A1 (70 +/- 21 ms vs 36 +/- 12 ms, P < 0.0001), a lack of rate adaptation of the functional refractory period (FRP changes/cycle length changes < 10% in 15 of 24 patients with lone paroxysmal AF vs 1/12 controls, P = 0.002) and a higher incidence of inducible AF with only one extrastimulus (13/24 vs 0/12, P = 0.0014). The total P wave duration in the surface ECG (89 +/- 14 ms vs 83 +/- 8 ms, P = 0.15), the intraatrial conduction time (36 +/- 14 ms vs 28 +/- 8 ms, P = 0.07), the presence of a fragmented atrial electrogram (16/24 vs 7/12, P = 0.62), the absolute value of the effective refractory period (204 +/- 28 ms vs 212 +/- 23 ms, P = 0.42), and the vulnerability index (3.0 +/- 1.5 vs 3.6 +/- 1.5, P = 0.26) were not statistically different between the two groups. The presence of a prolonged (> 50 ms) S1A1 and/or the presence of a lack of rate adaptation of the FRP and/or the presence of inducible AF identified patients with spontaneous lone paroxysmal AF with a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 67%, a positive predictive value of 85%, and a negative predictive value of 89%. In patients with lone paroxysmal AF, the electrophysiological study using conventional techniques allows not only to detect AF inducibility using a nonaggressive protocol, but also to reveal several electrophysiological abnormalities related to the atrial substrate itself. This atrial vulnerability may explain the high incidence of recurrences in patients with lone paroxysmal AF.
关于易引发阵发性心房颤动(AF)的心房电生理特性,人们了解甚少,尤其是在无结构性心脏病的患者中。本研究旨在分析孤立性阵发性AF患者的心房内传导、心房不应期和心律失常诱发性。对24例有孤立性阵发性AF病史且在电生理研究时处于窦性心律的患者进行了电生理研究。12例无任何房性心律失常病史的患者作为对照。孤立性阵发性AF患者的局部传导时间S1A1显著延长(70±21毫秒对36±12毫秒,P<0.0001),功能性不应期缺乏心率适应性(24例孤立性阵发性AF患者中有15例的功能性不应期变化/心动周期长度变化<10%,而对照组为1/12,P=0.002),且仅用一个期外刺激诱发AF的发生率更高(13/24对0/12,P=0.0014)。两组在体表心电图的总P波时限(89±14毫秒对83±8毫秒,P=0.15)、心房内传导时间(36±14毫秒对28±8毫秒,P=0.07)、碎裂心房电图的存在情况(16/24对7/12,P=0.62)、有效不应期的绝对值(204±28毫秒对212±23毫秒,P=0.42)以及易损性指数(3.0±1.5对3.6±1.5,P=0.26)方面无统计学差异。S1A1延长(>50毫秒)和/或功能性不应期缺乏心率适应性和/或可诱发AF的存在,识别出有自发孤立性阵发性AF患者的敏感性为96%,特异性为67%,阳性预测值为85%,阴性预测值为89%。在孤立性阵发性AF患者中,使用传统技术进行电生理研究不仅可以采用非侵入性方案检测AF的可诱发性,还能揭示与心房基质本身相关的几种电生理异常。这种心房易损性可能解释了孤立性阵发性AF患者复发率高的原因。