• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

50年来2000项精神分裂症对照试验的内容与质量。

Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years.

作者信息

Thornley B, Adams C

机构信息

Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, Summertown Pavilion, Oxford OX2 7LG.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1181-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1181.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1181
PMID:9794850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC28699/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive survey of the content and quality of intervention studies relevant to the treatment of schizophrenia.

DESIGN

Data were extracted from 2000 trials on the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Type and date of publication, country of origin, language, size of study, treatment setting, participant group, interventions, outcomes, and quality of study.

RESULTS

Hospital based drug trials undertaken in the United States were dominant in the sample (54%). Generally, studies were short (54%<6 weeks), small (mean number of patients 65), and poorly reported (64% had a quality score of <=2 (maximum score 5)). Over 600 different interventions were studied in these trials, and 640 different rating scales were used to measure outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Half a century of studies of limited quality, duration, and clinical utility leave much scope for well planned, conducted, and reported trials. The drug regulatory authorities should stipulate that the results of both explanatory and pragmatic trials are necessary before a compound is given a licence for everyday use.

摘要

目的

全面调查与精神分裂症治疗相关的干预性研究的内容和质量。

设计

从Cochrane精神分裂症研究组登记的2000项试验中提取数据。

主要观察指标

发表类型和日期、原产国、语言、研究规模、治疗环境、参与者组、干预措施、结果及研究质量。

结果

样本中以美国开展的基于医院的药物试验为主(54%)。总体而言,研究时间较短(54%<6周)、规模较小(患者平均数量为65名)且报告质量较差(64%的质量评分为≤2分(满分5分))。这些试验研究了600多种不同的干预措施,使用了640种不同的评定量表来衡量结果。

结论

半个世纪以来质量、时长和临床实用性有限的研究,为精心规划、实施和报告的试验留下了很大空间。药品监管当局应规定,在一种药物获得日常使用许可之前,解释性试验和实用性试验的结果都必不可少。

相似文献

1
Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years.50年来2000项精神分裂症对照试验的内容与质量。
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1181-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1181.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Antioxidant treatments for schizophrenia.精神分裂症的抗氧化治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 5;2(2):CD008919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008919.pub2.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Modafinil for people with schizophrenia or related disorders.用于精神分裂症或相关障碍患者的莫达非尼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 12;12(12):CD008661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008661.pub2.
6
Content and quality of 10,000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 60 years.60 年来精神分裂症 10000 项对照试验的内容和质量。
Schizophr Bull. 2013 Jan;39(1):226-9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr140. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
7
Zuclopenthixol dihydrochloride for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的二盐酸珠氯噻醇
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 16;11(11):CD005474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005474.pub2.
8
Control group bias in randomized atypical antipsychotic medication trials for schizophrenia.精神分裂症随机非典型抗精神病药物试验中的对照组偏倚。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Sep;62(9):961-70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.961.
9
Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的乙酰水杨酸(阿司匹林)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 10;8(8):CD012116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012116.pub2.
10
Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from schizophrenia trials in support of new drug applications submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration.支持向美国食品和药物管理局提交新药申请的精神分裂症试验疗效数据的探索性分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;73(6):856-64. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07539. Epub 2012 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Uptake of the IMMPACT-recommended core outcome set in randomised controlled trials on chronic neck or shoulder pain: a cross-sectional study.慢性颈肩痛随机对照试验中IMMPACT推荐的核心结局指标的纳入情况:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e094482. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094482.
2
Assessing the uptake of infertility core outcome set in IVF randomized controlled trials.评估体外受精随机对照试验中不孕症核心结局集的采用情况。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jan 1;40(1):85-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae255.
3
Antipsychotic dose, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy and extrapyramidal side-effects: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.抗精神病药剂量、多巴胺 D2 受体占有率与锥体外系副作用:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;28(8):3267-3277. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02203-y. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
Uptake of the core outcome set on polycystic ovary syndrome before and after its publication.多囊卵巢综合征核心结局指标发表前后的采用情况。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Sep 5;38(9):1816-1824. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead149.
5
Long-term efficacy of antipsychotic drugs in initially acutely ill adults with schizophrenia: systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗精神病药物对初发急性精神分裂症成年患者的长期疗效:系统评价与网状Meta分析
World Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;22(2):315-324. doi: 10.1002/wps.21089.
6
Quality of reporting of outcomes in trials of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers in adults: a protocol for a systematic survey.成人压力性溃疡治疗干预试验结局报告质量的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 15;9(2):e024633. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024633.
7
Outcome Selection and Methodological Quality of Major and Minor Shoulder Surgery Studies: A Scoping Review.主要和次要肩部手术研究的结局选择和方法学质量:范围综述。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Mar;477(3):606-619. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000578.
8
Global trends in high impact psychiatry research.高影响力精神病学研究的全球趋势。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;17(3):368-370. doi: 10.1002/wps.20573.
9
The "RCT augmentation": a novel simulation method to add patient heterogeneity into phase III trials.“RCT 增强”:一种将患者异质性加入 III 期临床试验的新模拟方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0534-6.
10
Fluphenazine (oral) versus placebo for schizophrenia.口服氟奋乃静与安慰剂治疗精神分裂症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 12;6(6):CD006352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006352.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group.
Schizophr Res. 1998 Oct 9;33(3):185-6. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(98)00072-3.
2
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?随机试验报告的质量会影响在荟萃分析中报告的干预效果估计值吗?
Lancet. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):609-13. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01085-X.
3
Randomized controlled trials in Archives of General Psychiatry (1959-1995): a prevalence study.《普通精神病学文献》(1959 - 1995年)中的随机对照试验:一项患病率研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Aug;55(8):754-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.8.754.
4
What are pragmatic trials?什么是实用性试验?
BMJ. 1998 Jan 24;316(7127):285. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7127.285.
5
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.提高随机对照试验报告的质量。CONSORT声明。
JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.8.637.
6
A retrospective quality analysis of 102 randomized trials in four leading urological journals from 1984-1989.
Urol Res. 1996;24(2):119-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00431090.
7
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?评估随机临床试验报告的质量:设盲是否必要?
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
8
The type and quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in UK public health journals.英国公共卫生期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)的类型和质量。
J Public Health Med. 1995 Dec;17(4):469-74.
9
The methodologic quality of randomization as assessed from reports of trials in specialist and general medical journals.从专业医学期刊和普通医学期刊的试验报告中评估随机化的方法学质量。
Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1995 Aug 26;Doc No 197:[81 paragraphs].
10
Developing a register of randomised controlled trials in primary care.建立基层医疗中随机对照试验的登记册。
BMJ. 1993 Apr 3;306(6882):897-900. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.897.