Tyson S F
Centre for Research in Rehabilitation, Department of Health Studies, Brunel University, Isleworth, Middlesex, UK.
Clin Rehabil. 1998 Oct;12(5):395-401. doi: 10.1191/026921598669871795.
To assess the effect of different aids on the amount of support hemiplegic subjects took from them. The relationship between the amount of support, severity of hemiplegia and walking ability were also assessed.
Hemiplegic subjects' gait and the amount of support they took from the aid were measured as they walked with a normal height stick, a high stick and a tripod.
Fifteen subjects with a hemiplegia of more than three months' duration who could walk independently were recruited.
Velocity, the gross function section of the Rivermead Motor Assessment, percentage bodyweight taken through the aid, the aid contact time, the placement of the aid, and the lateral shift of the pelvis when weight bearing were assessed.
No differences in the amount of support or walking ability were found with the different aids. There was a significant relationship between severity of hemiplegia and the percentage of bodyweight taken through the aid (r= -0.67), between aid contact time and severity of hemiplegia (-0.53) and between aid contact time and walking ability (-0.53). No relationship between walking ability and other measures of the amount of support was found.
Different types of aid did not influence the amount of support taken by hemiplegic subjects. These results contradict the beliefs of many neurological physiotherapists in Britain and the clinical implications are discussed.
评估不同辅助器具对偏瘫患者借助其提供支撑量的影响。同时评估支撑量、偏瘫严重程度与步行能力之间的关系。
让偏瘫患者分别使用正常高度的手杖、高把手杖和三脚杖行走,测量其步态以及借助辅助器具获得的支撑量。
招募了15名偏瘫持续时间超过3个月且能够独立行走的患者。
评估步行速度、Rivermead运动评估中的总体功能部分、通过辅助器具承担的体重百分比、辅助器具接触时间、辅助器具的放置位置以及负重时骨盆的侧向移动。
不同辅助器具在支撑量或步行能力方面未发现差异。偏瘫严重程度与通过辅助器具承担的体重百分比之间存在显著关系(r = -0.67),辅助器具接触时间与偏瘫严重程度之间存在显著关系(-0.53),辅助器具接触时间与步行能力之间也存在显著关系(-0.53)。未发现步行能力与其他支撑量指标之间存在关系。
不同类型的辅助器具并未影响偏瘫患者获得的支撑量。这些结果与英国许多神经物理治疗师的观点相悖,并对其临床意义进行了讨论。