Sengpiel F, Baddeley R J, Freeman T C, Harrad R, Blakemore C
University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford, UK.
Vision Res. 1998 Jul;38(14):2067-80. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00413-6.
Recently, it has been proposed that all suppressive phenomena observed in the primary visual cortex (V1) are mediated by a single mechanism, involving inhibition by pools of neurons, which, between them, represent a wide range of stimulus specificities. The strength of such inhibition would depend on the stimulus that produces it (particularly its contrast) rather than on the firing rate of the inhibited cell. We tested this hypothesis by measuring contrast-response functions (CRFs) of neurons in cat V1 for stimulation of the classical receptive field of the dominant eye with an optimal grating alone, and in the presence of inhibition caused by (1) a superimposed orthogonal grating (cross-orientation inhibition); (2) a surrounding iso-oriented grating (surround inhibition); and (3) an orthogonal grating in the other eye (interocular suppression). We fitted hyperbolic ratio functions and found that the effect of cross-orientation inhibition was best described as a rightward shift of the CRF ('contrast-gain control'), while surround inhibition and interocular suppression were primarily characterised as downward shifts of the CRF ('response-gain control'). However, the latter also showed a component of contrast-gain control. The two modes of suppression were differently distributed between the layers of cortex. Response-gain control prevailed in layer 4, whereas cells in layers 2/3, 5 and 6 mainly showed contrast-gain control. As in human observers, surround gratings caused suppression when the central grating was of high contrast, but in over a third of the cells tested, enhanced responses for low-contrast central stimuli, hence actually decreasing threshold contrast.
最近,有人提出,在初级视觉皮层(V1)中观察到的所有抑制现象均由单一机制介导,该机制涉及神经元池的抑制作用,这些神经元池共同代表了广泛的刺激特异性。这种抑制的强度将取决于产生它的刺激(特别是其对比度),而不是被抑制细胞的放电率。我们通过测量猫V1中神经元的对比度响应函数(CRF)来检验这一假设,具体方法是分别单独用最佳光栅刺激优势眼的经典感受野,以及在存在以下抑制作用的情况下进行刺激:(1)叠加的正交光栅(交叉方向抑制);(2)周围的同向光栅(周围抑制);(3)另一只眼中的正交光栅(双眼间抑制)。我们拟合了双曲线比率函数,发现交叉方向抑制的效果最好描述为CRF的向右移动(“对比度增益控制”),而周围抑制和双眼间抑制主要表现为CRF的向下移动(“响应增益控制”)。然而,后者也显示出对比度增益控制的成分。这两种抑制模式在皮层各层中的分布不同。响应增益控制在第4层中占主导,而第2/3层、第5层和第6层中的细胞主要表现出对比度增益控制。与人类观察者一样,当中央光栅具有高对比度时,周围光栅会引起抑制,但在超过三分之一的测试细胞中,低对比度中央刺激会增强反应,从而实际上降低了阈值对比度。