Chataway J, Feakes R, Coraddu F, Gray J, Deans J, Fraser M, Robertson N, Broadley S, Jones H, Clayton D, Goodfellow P, Sawcer S, Compston A
University of Cambridge Neurology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK.
Brain. 1998 Oct;121 ( Pt 10):1869-87. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.10.1869.
Genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis is implicated on the basis of classical family studies and phenotype analyses. The only reproducible legacy from the candidate gene approach has been the discovery of population associations with alleles of the major histocompatibility complex. Systematic genome scanning has since been applied using a panel of anonymous markers to identify areas of linkage in co-affected siblings. Here, we describe the principles of genome screening and update the UK survey of multiple sclerosis. This identified 20 regions of potential interest, but in none was there unequivocal linkage. In theory, attempting to replicate these findings in a second set of sibling pair families is the most appropriate way to distinguish true from false positives, but unfortunately the number of families required to do this reliably is prohibitively large. We used three approaches to increase the definition achieved by the screen: (i) the number of sibling pairs typed in an identified region of potential linkage was extended; (ii) the information extraction was increased in an identified region; and (iii) a search was made for missed regions of potential linkage. Each of these approaches has considerable limitations. A chromosome-by-chromosome account is given to direct future searches. Although an additional marker placed distal to the 'hit' on chromosome 14q increased linkage in this area, and typing extra sibling pairs increased linkage on chromosomes 6p and 17q, evidence for linkage was more commonly reduced and no additional regions of interest were found. A further refinement of the genome screen was undertaken by conditioning for the presence of HLA-DR15. This produced a surprising degree of segregation among the regions of interest, which divided into two distinct groups depending on DR15 sharing: the DR15-sharing cohort comprised loci on chromosomal areas 1p, 17q and X; and the DR15-non-sharing cohort was made up of loci on 1cen, 3p, 7p, 14q and 22q. This result further highlights the genetic complexity of multiple sclerosis. What can now be inferred is that a gene of major effect is excluded from 95% of the genome and one with a moderate role from 65%, whereas genes which make a very small biological contribution cannot be discounted from any region. The available results suggest that multiple sclerosis depends on independent or epistatic effects of several genes each with small individual effects, rather than a very few genes of major biological importance.
基于经典的家系研究和表型分析,提示了多发性硬化症存在遗传易感性。候选基因方法唯一可重复的成果是发现了与主要组织相容性复合体等位基因的人群关联。此后,通过使用一组匿名标记进行系统的基因组扫描,以识别共同患病兄弟姐妹中的连锁区域。在此,我们描述基因组筛选的原理,并更新英国多发性硬化症调查。这确定了20个潜在感兴趣的区域,但无一区域存在明确的连锁关系。理论上,尝试在第二组同胞对家庭中重复这些发现是区分真阳性和假阳性的最合适方法,但不幸的是,可靠地做到这一点所需的家庭数量大得令人望而却步。我们使用了三种方法来提高筛选所达到的分辨率:(i)扩展在已识别的潜在连锁区域中分型的同胞对数量;(ii)增加在已识别区域中的信息提取;(iii)搜索潜在连锁的遗漏区域。这些方法中的每一种都有相当大的局限性。逐染色体进行说明以指导未来的搜索。尽管在14号染色体“命中”位点远端添加的一个额外标记增加了该区域的连锁性,并且对额外的同胞对进行分型增加了6号染色体短臂和17号染色体长臂上的连锁性,但连锁证据更常见的是减少,并且未发现其他感兴趣的区域。通过对HLA - DR1存在情况进行条件分析,对基因组筛选进行了进一步优化。这在感兴趣的区域之间产生了惊人程度的分离,根据DR1共享情况分为两个不同的组:DR1共享队列包括染色体区域1p、17q和X上的位点;DR1非共享队列由1号染色体着丝粒、3号染色体短臂、7号染色体短臂、14号染色体长臂和22号染色体长臂上的位点组成。这一结果进一步凸显了多发性硬化症的遗传复杂性。现在可以推断,95%的基因组排除了一个主要效应基因,65%排除了一个中等作用基因,而在任何区域都不能排除具有非常小生物学贡献的基因。现有结果表明,多发性硬化症取决于几个各自具有小的个体效应的基因的独立或上位效应,而不是极少数具有主要生物学重要性的基因。