Wildhagen M F, Hilderink H B, Verzijl J G, Verheij J B, Kooij L, Tijmstra T, ten Kate L P, Habbema J D
Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jul;52(7):459-67. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.7.459.
Evaluating the costs, effects, and savings of several strategies for cystic fibrosis (CF) gene carrier screening.
A general model for evaluating prenatal, preconceptional, school, and neonatal carrier screening was constructed. For prenatal and preconceptional screening, two strategies were evaluated: single entry and double entry two step couple screening. Firstly, the Dutch situation was evaluated prospectively; subsequently the results were generalised to other carrier frequencies.
Prospective simulation model.
Of all screening strategies, neonatal carrier screening gives most carrier couples an informed choice concerning reproduction. If the parents of carrier newborns would not be tested however, prenatal screening detects most carrier couples. Prenatal and single entry preconceptional screening programmes have a favourable cost-savings balance in the Netherlands under a wide range of assumptions. For double entry preconceptional screening and neonatal screening, high enough values of uptake of screening, prenatal diagnosis, and induced abortion are necessary. School carrier screening does not have a favourable cost-savings balance.
If a CF screening programme is judged to be useful on individual and social grounds, costs considerations are no obstacle for prenatal and single entry preconceptional screening.
评估几种囊性纤维化(CF)基因携带者筛查策略的成本、效果和节省情况。
构建了一个用于评估产前、孕前、学校和新生儿携带者筛查的通用模型。对于产前和孕前筛查,评估了两种策略:单次录入和双次录入两步夫妇筛查。首先,对荷兰的情况进行前瞻性评估;随后将结果推广到其他携带者频率。
前瞻性模拟模型。
在所有筛查策略中,新生儿携带者筛查能让大多数携带者夫妇在生育问题上做出明智选择。然而,如果不检测携带者新生儿的父母,产前筛查能检测出大多数携带者夫妇。在荷兰,在广泛的假设条件下,产前和单次录入孕前筛查项目具有良好的成本节省平衡。对于双次录入孕前筛查和新生儿筛查,需要足够高的筛查接受率、产前诊断率和人工流产率。学校携带者筛查没有良好的成本节省平衡。
如果基于个人和社会理由判断CF筛查项目有用,成本因素不会阻碍产前和单次录入孕前筛查。