• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Costs, effects, and savings of screening for cystic fibrosis gene carriers.囊性纤维化基因携带者筛查的成本、效果及节省情况。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jul;52(7):459-67. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.7.459.
2
[Preconception screening of parents and carrier state of cystic fibrosis in the Netherlands: expenses and savings].[荷兰囊性纤维化患者父母的孕前筛查及携带者状态:费用与节省情况]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Mar 28;142(13):706-10.
3
Cost effectiveness of antenatal screening for cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化产前筛查的成本效益
BMJ. 1995 Dec 2;311(7018):1460-3; discussion 1463-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1460.
4
Preconceptional screening of couples for carriers of cystic fibrosis: a prospective evaluation of effects, costs and savings for different mutation detection methods.
Community Genet. 1999;2(2-3):74-81. doi: 10.1159/000016190.
5
The cost-effectiveness of prenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化产前携带者筛查的成本效益
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec;84(6):903-12.
6
Screening for cystic fibrosis and its evaluation.
Br Med Bull. 1998;54(4):857-75. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011734.
7
Community-wide screening for cystic fibrosis carriers could replace newborn screening for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.对囊性纤维化携带者进行全社区筛查可替代新生儿筛查来诊断囊性纤维化。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Nov;43(11):721-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01224.x.
8
A cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化产前携带者筛查的成本效益分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Apr;91(4):529-34. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00035-0.
9
Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis carriers: an economic evaluation.囊性纤维化携带者的产前筛查:一项经济学评估。
Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Oct;63(4):1160-74. doi: 10.1086/302042.
10
Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.基层医疗环境中的囊性纤维化携带者群体筛查。
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jul;59(1):234-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Carrier Screening Programs for Cystic Fibrosis, Fragile X Syndrome, Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemia, and Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Health Technology Assessment.囊性纤维化、脆性 X 综合征、血红蛋白病和地中海贫血、脊髓性肌萎缩症携带者筛查计划:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Aug 10;23(4):1-398. eCollection 2023.
2
Cost-effectiveness of the CFTR gene-sequencing test for asymptomatic carriers in the Colombian population.哥伦比亚人群无症状携带者 CFTR 基因测序检测的成本效益分析。
Biomedica. 2020 Jun 15;40(2):283-295. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.4816.
3
The Role of Information Provision in Economic Evaluations of Newborn Bloodspot Screening: A Systematic Review.信息提供在新生儿血斑筛查经济评估中的作用:一项系统综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Dec;13(6):615-26. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0177-2.
4
Evaluating Cost-effectiveness of Interventions That Affect Fertility and Childbearing: How Health Effects Are Measured Matters.评估影响生育和生育的干预措施的成本效益:健康影响的衡量方式至关重要。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Oct;35(7):818-46. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15583845. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
5
Genetic testing in the European Union: does economic evaluation matter?欧盟的基因检测:经济评估重要吗?
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Oct;13(5):651-61. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0319-x. Epub 2011 May 20.
6
Attitudes of potential providers towards preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening.潜在提供者对孕前囊性纤维化携带者筛查的态度。
J Genet Couns. 2004 Feb;13(1):31-44. doi: 10.1023/b:jogc.0000013193.80539.d1.
7
One of these things is not like the others: the idea of precedence in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.其中有一点与众不同:卫生技术评估和覆盖决策中的优先顺序概念。
Milbank Q. 2005;83(2):193-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00344.x.
8
Withdrawing low risk women from cervical screening programmes: mathematical modelling study.将低风险女性从宫颈癌筛查项目中撤出:数学建模研究
BMJ. 1999 Feb 6;318(7180):356-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7180.356.

本文引用的文献

1
Planning the development of cystic fibrosis gene carrier screening.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Apr;1(2):81-92. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100206.
2
The nonhospital costs of care of patients with CF in The Netherlands: results of a questionnaire.荷兰囊性纤维化患者的非住院护理费用:问卷调查结果
Eur Respir J. 1996 Nov;9(11):2215-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09112215.
3
Couple-based prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis in primary care settings.在基层医疗环境中基于夫妻的囊性纤维化产前筛查。
Prenat Diagn. 1996 May;16(5):397-404. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199605)16:5<397::AID-PD864>3.0.CO;2-I.
4
Cystic fibrosis: genotypic and phenotypic variations.囊性纤维化:基因型和表型变异
Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:777-807. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.004021.
5
Comparison of single-entry and double-entry two-step couple screening for cystic fibrosis carriers.
Hum Hered. 1996 Jan-Feb;46(1):20-5. doi: 10.1159/000154320.
6
Cascade testing for the identification of carriers of cystic fibrosis.
J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):159-64. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100305.
7
Heterozygote screening for cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化的杂合子筛查。
J Med Screen. 1994 Apr;1(2):130-3; discussion 133-4. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100214.
8
Cost of care of patients with cystic fibrosis in The Netherlands in 1990-1.1990 - 1年荷兰囊性纤维化患者的护理费用。
Thorax. 1996 Mar;51(3):298-301. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.3.298.
9
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.《英国医学杂志》经济学投稿的作者及同行评审指南。《英国医学杂志》经济评估工作小组。
BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275-83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275.
10
Cystic fibrosis heterozygote screening in 5,161 pregnant women.对5161名孕妇进行囊性纤维化杂合子筛查。
Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Apr;58(4):823-35.

囊性纤维化基因携带者筛查的成本、效果及节省情况。

Costs, effects, and savings of screening for cystic fibrosis gene carriers.

作者信息

Wildhagen M F, Hilderink H B, Verzijl J G, Verheij J B, Kooij L, Tijmstra T, ten Kate L P, Habbema J D

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Jul;52(7):459-67. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.7.459.

DOI:10.1136/jech.52.7.459
PMID:9799881
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1756730/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Evaluating the costs, effects, and savings of several strategies for cystic fibrosis (CF) gene carrier screening.

DESIGN

A general model for evaluating prenatal, preconceptional, school, and neonatal carrier screening was constructed. For prenatal and preconceptional screening, two strategies were evaluated: single entry and double entry two step couple screening. Firstly, the Dutch situation was evaluated prospectively; subsequently the results were generalised to other carrier frequencies.

SETTING

Prospective simulation model.

MAIN RESULTS

Of all screening strategies, neonatal carrier screening gives most carrier couples an informed choice concerning reproduction. If the parents of carrier newborns would not be tested however, prenatal screening detects most carrier couples. Prenatal and single entry preconceptional screening programmes have a favourable cost-savings balance in the Netherlands under a wide range of assumptions. For double entry preconceptional screening and neonatal screening, high enough values of uptake of screening, prenatal diagnosis, and induced abortion are necessary. School carrier screening does not have a favourable cost-savings balance.

CONCLUSIONS

If a CF screening programme is judged to be useful on individual and social grounds, costs considerations are no obstacle for prenatal and single entry preconceptional screening.

摘要

研究目的

评估几种囊性纤维化(CF)基因携带者筛查策略的成本、效果和节省情况。

设计

构建了一个用于评估产前、孕前、学校和新生儿携带者筛查的通用模型。对于产前和孕前筛查,评估了两种策略:单次录入和双次录入两步夫妇筛查。首先,对荷兰的情况进行前瞻性评估;随后将结果推广到其他携带者频率。

设置

前瞻性模拟模型。

主要结果

在所有筛查策略中,新生儿携带者筛查能让大多数携带者夫妇在生育问题上做出明智选择。然而,如果不检测携带者新生儿的父母,产前筛查能检测出大多数携带者夫妇。在荷兰,在广泛的假设条件下,产前和单次录入孕前筛查项目具有良好的成本节省平衡。对于双次录入孕前筛查和新生儿筛查,需要足够高的筛查接受率、产前诊断率和人工流产率。学校携带者筛查没有良好的成本节省平衡。

结论

如果基于个人和社会理由判断CF筛查项目有用,成本因素不会阻碍产前和单次录入孕前筛查。