• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Potential role of duplex Doppler sonography in acute renal colic.

作者信息

Roy C, Tuchmann C, Pfleger D, Guth S, Saussine C, Jacqmin D

机构信息

Department of Radiology B, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Hôpital Civil, France.

出版信息

J Clin Ultrasound. 1998 Nov-Dec;26(9):427-32. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199811/12)26:9<427::aid-jcu2>3.0.co;2-p.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199811/12)26:9<427::aid-jcu2>3.0.co;2-p
PMID:9800157
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the value of renal duplex Doppler sonography in diagnosing obstruction in patients with acute renal colic.

METHODS

We compared the results of renal duplex Doppler sonography with those of intravenous urography (IVU) in 65 patients presenting with symptoms of renal colic. The Doppler spectral waveforms were used to calculate the resistance index (RI). The difference between the mean RIs (delta RI) in the 2 kidneys was calculated for each patient. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of delta RI for the diagnosis of obstruction were calculated with several discriminatory thresholds.

RESULTS

All patients had an obstruction on IVU. When a high delta RI threshold for obstruction (delta RI > or = 0.1) was applied, the sensitivity and specificity of duplex Doppler sonography were 10% and 80%, respectively. When the delta RI threshold was decreased, the sensitivity increased but the specificity decreased, and both remained quite low. Twelve patients had a lower mean RI in the obstructed kidney than in the normal contralateral kidney. Among 14 patients without pyelocaliceal dilatation, the sensitivity of duplex Doppler sonography was 70% with a delta RI threshold of 0.03.

CONCLUSIONS

Duplex Doppler sonography is not sensitive enough to diagnose obstruction in patients with acute renal colic.

摘要

相似文献

1
Potential role of duplex Doppler sonography in acute renal colic.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1998 Nov-Dec;26(9):427-32. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199811/12)26:9<427::aid-jcu2>3.0.co;2-p.
2
Acute renal colic: diagnosis with duplex Doppler US.急性肾绞痛:双功多普勒超声诊断
Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):697-701. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972809.
3
Acute obstruction of the renal collecting system: the intrarenal resistive index is a useful yet time-dependent parameter for diagnosis.肾集合系统急性梗阻:肾内阻力指数是一个有用但依赖时间的诊断参数。
Eur Radiol. 1998;8(8):1429-32. doi: 10.1007/s003300050568.
4
Predictive role of duplex Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute renal obstruction in patients with unilateral renal colic.双功多普勒超声在单侧肾绞痛患者急性肾梗阻诊断中的预测作用
Clin Nephrol. 2009 Jun;71(6):680-6. doi: 10.5414/cnp71680.
5
Value of duplex Doppler ultrasonography in renal colic.双功多普勒超声检查在肾绞痛中的价值
Eur Urol. 2002 Jan;41(1):71-8. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(01)00005-7.
6
Duplex Doppler sonography in patients with acute renal colic: prospective study and literature review.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35(2):135-40. doi: 10.1023/b:urol.0000020302.65486.f8.
7
Doppler-duplex ultrasound in renal colic.肾绞痛中的多普勒双功超声检查
Eur J Radiol. 1996 Sep;23(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/0720-048x(96)01055-8.
8
Acute renal obstruction: evaluation with intrarenal duplex Doppler and conventional US.急性肾梗阻:采用肾内双功多普勒和传统超声进行评估
Radiology. 1993 Mar;186(3):685-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.186.3.8430174.
9
Role of resistive index in renal colic.阻力指数在肾绞痛中的作用。
Urol Res. 2007 Dec;35(6):307-12. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0116-2. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
10
Resistive index in renal colic: a prospective study.肾绞痛中的阻力指数:一项前瞻性研究。
BJU Int. 1999 Mar;83(4):378-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00946.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Duplex Doppler sonography in patients with acute renal colic: prospective study and literature review.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35(2):135-40. doi: 10.1023/b:urol.0000020302.65486.f8.