• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾绞痛中的多普勒双功超声检查

Doppler-duplex ultrasound in renal colic.

作者信息

de Toledo L S, Martínez-Berganza Asensio T, Cozcolluela Cabrejas R, de Gregorio Ariza M A, Pardina Cortina P, Ripa Saldias L

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Reina Sofia Hospital, Navarra, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 1996 Sep;23(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/0720-048x(96)01055-8.

DOI:10.1016/0720-048x(96)01055-8
PMID:8886728
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of intrarenal Doppler ultrasound (US) in patients with renal colic and to establish the usefulness of this diagnostic method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 121 patients with renal colic and 70 healthy individuals, 382 kidneys were examined with color duplex US. Mean intrarenal-arterial resistive index (RI), and the difference of mean RIs (dRI) between both kidneys were determined. In 64 patients, RI and dRI were compared with urographic findings (time of delay pyelogram between both kidneys).

RESULTS

In the 70 healthy individuals, RI was 0.62 +/- 0.045 and dRI 0.018 +/- 0.01. In the 121 patients with renal colic, RI (0.71 +/- 0.06) was significantly superior (P < 0.001) with respect to the opposite kidney, with a dRI of 0.09 +/- 0.055. In a correlation performed in 64 patients with urographic findings among color doppler US, with a RI > or = 0.70 and/or dRI > or = 0.06 as an indicative value of obstruction, sensitivity and specificity were 91.8% for patients with delayed pyelogram (n = 37 patients), and 48.1% for patients with nondelayed pyelogram (n = 27 patients) with a specificity of 92.8% with respect to the group of normal patients. In the group of patients with delayed pyelogram, RI was significantly superior (P < 0.05) in patients with an evolution time greater than 24 hours, in patients with proximal ureteral obstruction and in patients who had signs of pyelonephritis. There were no significant differences in the group of patients with nondelayed pyelograms.

CONCLUSION

Color Doppler US is useful to fundamentally evaluate the consequences of the obstruction on renal function. Other factors such as evolution time of the symptomology, obstruction level, or existence of pyelonephritis can alter the US-Doppler values.

摘要

目的

确定肾内多普勒超声(US)在肾绞痛患者中的作用,并确立这种诊断方法的实用性。

材料与方法

对121例肾绞痛患者和70例健康个体的382个肾脏进行了彩色双功超声检查。测定了平均肾内动脉阻力指数(RI)以及双肾之间平均RI的差值(dRI)。在64例患者中,将RI和dRI与尿路造影结果(双肾延迟肾盂造影时间)进行了比较。

结果

在70例健康个体中,RI为0.62±0.045,dRI为0.018±0.01。在121例肾绞痛患者中,RI(0.71±0.06)相对于对侧肾脏显著更高(P<0.001),dRI为0.09±0.055。在64例进行了彩色多普勒超声与尿路造影结果相关性分析的患者中,以RI≥0.70和/或dRI≥0.06作为梗阻的指示值,肾盂造影延迟患者(n = 37例)的敏感性和特异性分别为91.8%,肾盂造影未延迟患者(n = 27例)的敏感性和特异性分别为48.1%,相对于正常患者组特异性为92.8%。在肾盂造影延迟的患者组中,病程超过24小时的患者、输尿管上段梗阻患者以及有肾盂肾炎体征的患者,RI显著更高(P<0.05)。肾盂造影未延迟的患者组中无显著差异。

结论

彩色多普勒超声有助于从根本上评估梗阻对肾功能造成的影响。其他因素,如症状的病程、梗阻程度或肾盂肾炎的存在,可改变超声多普勒值。

相似文献

1
Doppler-duplex ultrasound in renal colic.肾绞痛中的多普勒双功超声检查
Eur J Radiol. 1996 Sep;23(2):143-8. doi: 10.1016/0720-048x(96)01055-8.
2
Acute renal colic: diagnosis with duplex Doppler US.急性肾绞痛:双功多普勒超声诊断
Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):697-701. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972809.
3
Role of resistive index in renal colic.阻力指数在肾绞痛中的作用。
Urol Res. 2007 Dec;35(6):307-12. doi: 10.1007/s00240-007-0116-2. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
4
Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in 100 patients with renal colic.100例肾绞痛患者的彩色多普勒超声(CDU)对尿路的功能评估
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Jan;53(1):131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.01.014.
5
Predictive role of duplex Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute renal obstruction in patients with unilateral renal colic.双功多普勒超声在单侧肾绞痛患者急性肾梗阻诊断中的预测作用
Clin Nephrol. 2009 Jun;71(6):680-6. doi: 10.5414/cnp71680.
6
Intrarenal Doppler ultrasound studies in normal and acutely obstructed kidneys.正常及急性梗阻性肾脏的肾内多普勒超声研究
Br J Radiol. 1992 Mar;65(771):207-12. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-65-771-207.
7
Acute obstruction of the renal collecting system: the intrarenal resistive index is a useful yet time-dependent parameter for diagnosis.肾集合系统急性梗阻:肾内阻力指数是一个有用但依赖时间的诊断参数。
Eur Radiol. 1998;8(8):1429-32. doi: 10.1007/s003300050568.
8
Potential role of duplex Doppler sonography in acute renal colic.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1998 Nov-Dec;26(9):427-32. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199811/12)26:9<427::aid-jcu2>3.0.co;2-p.
9
Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index.孕妇肾绞痛:肾阻力指数的作用
Urology. 2000 Mar;55(3):344-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00475-6.
10
Correlation between the renal resistive index (RI) and nonenhanced computed tomography in acute renal colic: how reliable is the RI in distinguishing obstruction?急性肾绞痛中肾阻力指数(RI)与非增强计算机断层扫描的相关性:RI在鉴别梗阻方面的可靠性如何?
J Ultrasound Med. 2006 Sep;25(9):1113-20; quiz 1121-3. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.9.1113.

引用本文的文献

1
Doppler sonographic evaluation of resistive index of intra-renal arteries in acute ureteric obstruction.经多普勒超声评价急性输尿管梗阻肾内动脉阻力指数。
J Ultrasound. 2021 Dec;24(4):481-488. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00539-7. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of renal parenchyma in acute ureteral obstruction.扩散加权磁共振成像和多普勒超声检查在急性输尿管梗阻肾实质评估中的应用
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Feb 15;8(2):2719-26. eCollection 2015.
3
The renal resistive index as a predictor of acute hydronephrosis in patients with renal colic.
肾阻力指数作为肾绞痛患者急性肾积水的预测指标。
J Ultrasound. 2012 Oct 14;15(4):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jus.2012.10.003. Print 2012 Dec.
4
Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic.双功多普勒超声对急性肾绞痛患者尿路的功能评估
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2012;5:15-21. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S27628. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
5
Duplex Doppler sonography in patients with acute renal colic: prospective study and literature review.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35(2):135-40. doi: 10.1023/b:urol.0000020302.65486.f8.