Poffenbarger B A, Podgorsak E B
McGill University, Department of Medical Physics, Montreal General Hospital, Québec, Canada.
Med Phys. 1998 Oct;25(10):1935-43. doi: 10.1118/1.598383.
The potential for radiosurgery with an isocentric teletherapy cobalt unit was evaluated in three areas: (1) the physical properties of radiosurgical beams, (2) the quality of radiosurgical dose distributions obtained with four to ten noncoplanar converging arcs, and (3) the accuracy with which the radiosurgical dose can be delivered. In each of these areas the cobalt unit provides a viable alternative to an isocentric linear accelerator (linac) as a radiation source for radiosurgery. A 10 MV x-ray beam from a linac used for radiosurgery served as a standard for comparison. The difference between the 80%-20% penumbras of stationary radiosurgical fields in the nominal diameter range from 10 to 40 mm of the cobalt-60 and 10 MV photon beams is remarkably small, with the cobalt-60 beam penumbras, on average, only about 0.7 mm larger than those of the linac beam. Differences between the cobalt-60 and 10 MV radiosurgical treatment plans in terms of dose homogeneity within the target volume, conformity of the prescribed isodose volume to the target volume, and dose falloffs outside the target volume are also minimal, and therefore of essentially no clinical significance. Moreover, measured isodose distributions for a radiosurgical procedure on our Theratron T-780 cobalt unit agreed with calculated distributions to within the +/- 1 mm spatial and +/- 5% numerical dose tolerances, which are generally specified for radiosurgery. The viability of isocentric cobalt units for radiosurgery will be of particular interest to centers in developing countries where cobalt units, because of their relatively low costs, provide the only megavoltage source of radiation for radiotherapy, and could easily and inexpensively be modified for radiosurgery. Of course, the quality assurance protocols and mechanical condition of a particular teletherapy cobalt unit must meet stringent requirements before the use of the unit for radiosurgery can be advocated.
(1)放射外科射束的物理特性;(2)通过四至十个非共面汇聚弧获得的放射外科剂量分布质量;(3)放射外科剂量的递送精度。在这些方面的每一个方面,钴单元都为作为放射外科手术辐射源的等中心直线加速器提供了可行的替代方案。来自用于放射外科手术的直线加速器的10 MV X射线束用作比较标准。钴-60和10 MV光子束在标称直径范围为10至40 mm的固定放射外科野的80%-20%半值宽度之间的差异非常小,钴-60射束的半值宽度平均仅比直线加速器射束的半值宽度大约0.7 mm。钴-60和10 MV放射外科治疗计划在靶区内剂量均匀性、规定等剂量体积与靶区的适形性以及靶区外剂量衰减方面的差异也很小,因此基本上没有临床意义。此外,我们的Theratron T-780钴单元上放射外科手术的实测等剂量分布与计算分布在空间上的偏差在±1 mm以内,数值剂量偏差在±5%以内,这是放射外科手术通常规定的公差范围。对于发展中国家的中心来说,等中心钴单元用于放射外科手术的可行性将特别令人感兴趣,因为钴单元成本相对较低,是放射治疗唯一的兆伏级辐射源,并且可以轻松且廉价地改装用于放射外科手术。当然,在提倡将特定的远距离治疗钴单元用于放射外科手术之前,其质量保证方案和机械状况必须满足严格要求。