Aronson S, Savage R, Toledano A, Albertucci M, Lytle B, Karp R, Loop F
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998 Oct;12(5):512-8. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(98)90092-1.
Intraoperative myocardial contrast echocardiography was used to determine whether the identification of regional myocardial flow patterns during revascularization could predict myocardial contractile function immediately after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and at 1 month after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.
A prospective, open-labeled, longitudinal analysis.
Two independent university hospitals.
Twenty patients, during and up to 1 month after CABG.
The contrast agent Albunex (Mallenckrodt Medical, Inc, St Louis, MO) was injected into the aortic root during CPB.
Myocardial contrast echocardiography opacification of flow was graded from intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic images of the left ventricle in the short-axis, midpapillary view. The same myocardial images were also evaluated for regional wall motion abnormalities at 15, 30, and 60 minutes, 24 hours, 5 to 8 days, and 1 month after CPB. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the flow scores and regional function data from identical segments. Regional flow represented by contrast enhancement was assessed in 70% of the myocardial regions (55 of 80 possible segments; 95% confidence interval [CI], 61 to 76). Flow was more easily evaluated in the posterior region (95%) than in the anterior (70%) or septal regions (60%), and least likely evaluated in the lateral regions (50%). Regional wall motion was scored in 84% of the myocardial regions (469 of 560 possible regions). Function (segmental wall motion) was assessed in all regions with equal success. Segmental function and flow scores were matched to the same regions 66% of the time (53 of 80 possible series; 95% CI, 55 to 76). Regional myocardial contrast flow patterns did not predict myocardial function at 15, 30, or 60 minutes after separation from CPB. However, contrast opacification of flow did predict regional myocardial function at 1 week (p < or = 0.05) and at 1 month (p < or = 0.01) after CABG surgery. The probability that myocardial function would be normal at 1 month was 0.62 when intraoperative flow opacification was abnormal and 0.98 when flow opacification was normal. For patients with normal flow, the estimated odds of having normal myocardial function were 3.33 times those of patients with abnormal flow at 1 week (odds ratio, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.09 to 10.19) and 18.5 times those of patients with abnormal flow at 1 month (95% CI, 2.44 to 140.48).
Intraoperative application of myocardial contrast echocardiography to determine regional flow patterns after revascularization may help differentiate conditions of left ventricular systolic dysfunction immediately after separation from CPB for CABG surgery and appear to predict myocardial function at 1 month.
采用术中心肌对比超声心动图来确定血运重建期间局部心肌血流模式的识别是否能够预测体外循环(CPB)结束后即刻以及冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后1个月时的心肌收缩功能。
一项前瞻性、开放标签的纵向分析。
两家独立的大学医院。
20例CABG手术期间及术后1个月内的患者。
在CPB期间将造影剂Albunex(Mallenckrodt Medical公司,密苏里州圣路易斯)注入主动脉根部。
通过术中经食管超声心动图获取左心室短轴、乳头肌中部视图的图像,对心肌对比超声心动图的血流灌注进行分级。在CPB后15、30和60分钟、24小时、5至8天以及1个月时,对相同的心肌图像进行局部室壁运动异常评估。采用逻辑回归分析来分析相同节段的血流评分和局部功能数据。在70%的心肌区域(80个可能节段中的55个;95%置信区间[CI],61%至76%)评估了由对比增强表示的局部血流。后部区域(95%)的血流比前部(70%)或间隔区域(60%)更容易评估,而外侧区域(50%)的血流最难评估。在84%的心肌区域(560个可能区域中的469个)对局部室壁运动进行了评分。在所有区域评估功能(节段性室壁运动)的成功率相同。节段性功能和血流评分在66%的时间内与相同区域匹配(80个可能序列中的53个;95%CI,55%至76%)。CPB结束后15、30或60分钟时,局部心肌对比血流模式无法预测心肌功能。然而,血流的对比增强确实可以预测CABG术后1周(p≤0.05)和1个月时(p≤0.01)的局部心肌功能。术中血流增强异常时,1个月时心肌功能正常的概率为0.62,而血流增强正常时为0.98。对于血流正常的患者,1周时心肌功能正常的估计比值比是血流异常患者的3.33倍(比值比,3.33;95%CI,1.09至10.19),1个月时是血流异常患者的18.5倍(95%CI,2.44至140.48)。
术中应用心肌对比超声心动图确定血运重建后的局部血流模式,可能有助于鉴别CABG手术CPB结束后即刻左心室收缩功能障碍的情况,并且似乎可以预测1个月时的心肌功能。