Shrout P E
Department of Psychology, New York University, NY 1003, USA.
Stat Methods Med Res. 1998 Sep;7(3):301-17. doi: 10.1177/096228029800700306.
Psychiatric research has benefited from attention to measurement theories of reliability, and reliability/agreement statistics for psychopathology ratings and diagnoses are regularly reported in empirical reports. Nevertheless, there are still controversies regarding how reliability should be measured, and the amount of resources that should be spent on studying measurement quality in research programs. These issues are discussed in the context of recent theoretical and technical contributions to the statistical analysis of reliability. Special attention is paid to statistical studies published since Kraemer's 1992 review of reliability methods in this journal.
精神病学研究受益于对可靠性测量理论的关注，实证报告中也经常会报告精神病理学评级和诊断的可靠性/一致性统计数据。然而，在如何测量可靠性以及在研究项目中应投入多少资源来研究测量质量方面，仍然存在争议。本文将在近期对可靠性统计分析的理论和技术贡献的背景下讨论这些问题。特别关注自1992年克雷默在本期刊上对可靠性方法进行综述以来发表的统计研究。
