• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Endothelial cell culture from human cerebral cavernous malformations.

作者信息

Baev N I, Awad I A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn., USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 1998 Nov;29(11):2426-34. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.11.2426.

DOI:10.1161/01.str.29.11.2426
PMID:9804658
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) is a common and frequently unrecognized cause of stroke and epilepsy. It consists of blood-filled caverns lined by endothelial cells (EC) and devoid of mature vessel wall structure. Cultured EC obtained from CCM may express phenotypic and genotypic alterations contributing to CCM pathogenesis. We report the first successful isolation and growth in vitro of primary EC lines from human CCM lesions.

METHODS

We developed a procedure for the isolation and growth of EC from human CCM, confirmed their EC origin by a panel of molecular markers, and determined by immunocytochemistry the basic expression patterns of 6 transmembrane receptor protein kinases comparing brain, skin, and CCM primary EC lines grown identically.

RESULTS

Several CCM EC lines were established from 2 patients after we treated the excised specimens with 0.3% trypsin/1% EDTA, selective cloning, and growth in MCDB107 containing 0.3 g/L heparin, 0.15 g/L endothelial cell growth supplement, and 15% FBS. The CCM EC showed contact inhibition and a rounded cobblestone appearance. The cells expressed CD31, CD105, von Willebrand factor, and binding sites for Ulex europaeus agglutinin, type 1 and acetylated LDL. They showed low levels of Flt-1, Flk-1, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta RI, and TGF-beta RII expression but stained strongly with antibodies against Tie-1 and Tie-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Cultured CCM EC retained their endothelial phenotype. Brain, skin, and CCM EC lines did not significantly differ in their staining patterns with antibodies against Flt-1, Flk-1, TGF-beta RI, TGF-beta RII, Tie-1, and Tie-2. These cell lines will assist in defining molecular phenotype and genotype alterations in association with CCM.

摘要

相似文献

1
Endothelial cell culture from human cerebral cavernous malformations.
Stroke. 1998 Nov;29(11):2426-34. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.11.2426.
2
Expression of endothelial cell angiogenesis receptors in human cerebrovascular malformations.人脑血管畸形中内皮细胞血管生成受体的表达
Neurosurgery. 2001 Feb;48(2):359-67; discussion 367-8. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200102000-00024.
3
[Immunohistochemical study of vascular endothelial growth factor, relative receptors and ligands in vascular endothelial cells of cerebral arteriovenous malformation].脑动静脉畸形血管内皮细胞中血管内皮生长因子、相关受体及配体的免疫组织化学研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2001 Sep;39(9):675-8.
4
Expression of CD105 (endoglin) in arteriolar endothelial cells of human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle.
Reproduction. 2002 Nov;124(5):703-11. doi: 10.1530/rep.0.1240703.
5
In vitro characterization of the angiogenic phenotype and genotype of the endothelia derived from sporadic cerebral cavernous malformations.体外鉴定散发性脑动静脉畸形血管内皮的血管生成表型和基因型。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(3):722-31; discussion 731-2. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318219569f.
6
A comparative study of endothelial cell markers expressed in chronically inflamed human tissues: MECA-79, Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines, von Willebrand factor, CD31, CD34, CD105 and CD146.慢性炎症人组织中表达的内皮细胞标志物的比较研究:MECA-79、趋化因子的达菲抗原受体、血管性血友病因子、CD31、CD34、CD105和CD146。
J Pathol. 2005 Jul;206(3):260-8. doi: 10.1002/path.1788.
7
Analysis of endoglin expression in normal brain tissue and in cerebral arteriovenous malformations.正常脑组织和脑动静脉畸形中内皮糖蛋白表达的分析。
Stroke. 2000 Nov;31(11):2653-60. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.11.2653.
8
Endothelial progenitor cell culture and differentiation in vitro: a methodological comparison using human umbilical cord blood.内皮祖细胞的体外培养与分化:使用人脐带血的方法学比较
Cardiovasc Res. 2003 May 1;58(2):478-86. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(03)00252-9.
9
Long-term prognostic significance of neoangiogenesis in breast carcinomas: comparison of Tie-2/Tek, CD105, and CD31 immunocytochemical expression.乳腺癌新生血管生成的长期预后意义:Tie-2/Tek、CD105和CD31免疫细胞化学表达的比较
Hum Pathol. 2004 Feb;35(2):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2003.10.008.
10
In vitro analysis of human periodontal microvascular endothelial cells.人牙周微血管内皮细胞的体外分析
J Periodontol. 2014 Aug;85(8):1135-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130209. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Simplex cerebral cavernous malformations with mutation have distinct clinical characteristics.伴有突变的单纯型脑海绵状血管畸形具有独特的临床特征。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 26;13:946324. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.946324. eCollection 2022.
2
Procedure for the Isolation of Endothelial Cells from Human Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation (cAVM) Tissues.从人脑动静脉畸形(cAVM)组织中分离内皮细胞的方法。
Front Cell Neurosci. 2018 Feb 7;12:30. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00030. eCollection 2018.
3
Systems biology and proteomic analysis of cerebral cavernous malformation.
脑动静脉畸形的系统生物学和蛋白质组学分析。
Expert Rev Proteomics. 2014 Jun;11(3):395-404. doi: 10.1586/14789450.2014.896742. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
4
Temporal expression analysis of angiogenesis-related genes in brain development.大脑发育过程中血管生成相关基因的时序表达分析
Vasc Cell. 2012 Oct 1;4(1):16. doi: 10.1186/2045-824X-4-16.
5
Cavernous malformations of the orbit: a distinct entity? A review of own experiences.
Neurosurg Rev. 2007 Jan;30(1):50-4; discussion 54-5. doi: 10.1007/s10143-006-0055-3. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
6
Isolation and culture of microvascular endothelial cells from gliomas of different WHO grades.不同世界卫生组织(WHO)分级的胶质瘤中微血管内皮细胞的分离与培养。
J Neurooncol. 2006 Jan;76(1):39-48. doi: 10.1007/s11060-005-3674-6.
7
Differential gene expression in human cerebrovascular malformations.人类脑血管畸形中的差异基因表达
Neurosurgery. 2003 Feb;52(2):465-77; discussion 477-8. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000044131.03495.22.