• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼科相关二元数据的统计分析:一种加权逻辑回归方法。

Statistical analysis of correlated binary data in ophthalmology: a weighted logistic regression approach.

作者信息

Leite M L, Nicolosi A

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, National Research Council, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998 Sep;5(3):117-31. doi: 10.1076/opep.5.3.117.8365.

DOI:10.1076/opep.5.3.117.8365
PMID:9805345
Abstract

Ophthalmological studies often deal with correlated binary outcome variables. We propose a weighted logistic regression method to account for the intraclass correlations between eyes. Using simulation studies, we compared this method with two standard logistic regression approaches: a) based on eyes as the unit of analysis and b) treating individuals classified as cases if at least one eye is affected. The considered approaches were evaluated in terms of type I error, power and estimation properties. The simulation results reveal that the subject-based approach can lead to substantial bias in regression coefficient estimates when the correlation between eyes is heterogeneous across groups or when it is low, and that power is directly affected by this bias. Furthermore, the standard eye-based approach, which ignores intrasubject correlations, leads to inflated type I error rates. The proposed weighted approach performed well in all of the situations considered. This is a simple method which can be implemented using any current statistical or epidemiological package that includes logistic regression analysis.

摘要

眼科研究常常涉及相关的二元结局变量。我们提出一种加权逻辑回归方法,以考虑双眼之间的组内相关性。通过模拟研究,我们将该方法与两种标准逻辑回归方法进行了比较:a)以眼为分析单位;b)若至少一只眼受影响,则将个体归类为病例。从一类错误、检验效能和估计特性方面对所考虑的方法进行了评估。模拟结果表明,当双眼之间的相关性在不同组间存在异质性或相关性较低时,基于个体的方法可能会导致回归系数估计出现实质性偏差,且检验效能会直接受到这种偏差的影响。此外,忽略个体内相关性的标准基于眼的方法会导致一类错误率升高。在所考虑的所有情况下,所提出的加权方法表现良好。这是一种简单的方法,可以使用任何包含逻辑回归分析的现有统计或流行病学软件包来实现。

相似文献

1
Statistical analysis of correlated binary data in ophthalmology: a weighted logistic regression approach.眼科相关二元数据的统计分析:一种加权逻辑回归方法。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998 Sep;5(3):117-31. doi: 10.1076/opep.5.3.117.8365.
2
Statistical inference for correlated data in ophthalmologic studies.眼科研究中相关数据的统计推断。
Stat Med. 2006 Aug 30;25(16):2771-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.2425.
3
Comparison of alternative regression models for paired binary data.配对二元数据的替代回归模型比较。
Stat Med. 1994 May 30;13(10):1023-36. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131005.
4
A likelihood approach to estimating sensitivity and specificity for binocular data: application in ophthalmology.一种用于估计双眼数据敏感性和特异性的似然方法:在眼科中的应用。
Stat Med. 2007 Jul 30;26(17):3300-14. doi: 10.1002/sim.2791.
5
Methods for analyzing data from probabilistic linkage strategies based on partially identifying variables.基于部分识别变量的概率链接策略数据分析方法。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 30;31(30):4231-42. doi: 10.1002/sim.5498. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
6
Weighted estimation for confounded binary outcomes subject to misclassification.有混淆的二分类结局受错误分类影响的加权估计。
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 10;37(3):425-436. doi: 10.1002/sim.7522. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
Statistics in ophthalmic research: two eyes, one eye or the mean?
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000 Dec;63(12):885-92.
8
Adjustment for regression dilution in epidemiological regression analyses.流行病学回归分析中回归稀释的校正。
Ann Epidemiol. 1998 Jan;8(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(97)00107-5.
9
Testing equality of proportions for correlated binary data in ophthalmologic studies.眼科研究中相关二元数据比例的等效性检验。
J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(4):611-619. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2016.1167072. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
10
A weighted Cox model for modelling time-dependent exposures in the analysis of case-control studies.一种用于病例对照研究分析中建模时变暴露的加权 Cox 模型。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):839-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.3764.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of neonatal clinical trials with twin births.双胎分娩新生儿临床试验分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Feb 26;9:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-12.