White T L, Hornung D E, Kurtz D B, Treisman M, Sheehe P
Clinical Olfactory Research Center, SUNY Health Science Center, Syracuse, USA.
Am J Psychol. 1998 Fall;111(3):411-34.
Just as a written word can be encoded and retained in memory verbally or visually, an odor might be retained as a verbal description or perceptual (olfactory) code. However, one view holds that olfactory memory in the short term does not exist as a separate perceptual code. This was examined in an experiment in which memory errors could be seen as deriving from the substitution of similar verbal or olfactory codes. The odorants presented for recall were divided into three groups: base odorants (which might be replaced in memory by similar verbal or olfactory representations), verbal foils (stimuli dissimilar to the base stimuli in odor but similar in name), and odor foils (the reverse). The substitution errors made in attempting to recall test odorants were classified as verbal or olfactory. A substantial proportion of the errors were olfactory, but verbal errors also occurred. These results support the presence of short-term perceptual olfactory memory rather than simply verbal encoding of olfactory perceptions.
正如一个书面文字可以通过言语或视觉方式进行编码并保留在记忆中一样,一种气味可能作为言语描述或感知(嗅觉)编码被保留下来。然而,有一种观点认为,短期嗅觉记忆并不以单独的感知编码形式存在。在一项实验中对此进行了检验,在该实验中,记忆错误可被视为源于相似言语或嗅觉编码的替换。用于回忆的气味剂被分为三组:基础气味剂(在记忆中可能被相似的言语或嗅觉表征所替代)、言语干扰物(在气味上与基础刺激不同但名称相似的刺激)和气味干扰物(反之)。在尝试回忆测试气味剂时所犯的替换错误被分类为言语错误或嗅觉错误。相当一部分错误是嗅觉错误,但言语错误也会出现。这些结果支持短期感知嗅觉记忆的存在,而不仅仅是嗅觉感知的言语编码。