Suppr超能文献

0.5%罗哌卡因与0.5%布比卡因用于腋路臂丛神经麻醉的比较。

A comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia.

作者信息

McGlade D P, Kalpokas M V, Mooney P H, Chamley D, Mark A H, Torda T A

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Oct;26(5):515-20. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600507.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5% bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia. Sixty-six patients undergoing upper limb surgery were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial. Five patients were subsequently excluded for various reasons. Of the remaining patients, 30 received 40 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 31 received 40 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Brachial plexus block was performed by the axillary approach using a standardized technique with a peripheral nerve stimulator. Parameters investigated included the frequency, onset and duration of sensory and motor block, the quality of anaesthesia and the occurrence of any adverse events. The six principal nerves of the brachial plexus were studied individually. The frequency for achieving anaesthesia per nerve ranged from 70 to 90% in the ropivacaine group and 81 to 87% in the bupivacaine group. The median onset time for anaesthesia was 10 to 20 minutes with ropivacaine and 10 to 30 minutes with bupivacaine, and the median duration was 5.3 to 8.7h with ropivacaine and 6.9 to 20.3h with bupivacaine. Motor block was evaluated at the elbow, wrist and hand, and was completely achieved at a rate of 60 to 73% in the ropivacaine group and 55 to 71% in the bupivacaine group. The median duration of motor block was 6.5 to 7.5h with ropivacaine and 6.0 to 9.0h with bupivacaine. These parameters were not statistically different. The duration of partial motor block at the wrist (6.8 v 16.4h) and hand (6.7 v 12.3h) was significantly longer with bupivacaine. Ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% appeared equally efficacious as long-acting local anaesthetics for axillary brachial plexus block.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较0.5%罗哌卡因与0.5%布比卡因用于腋路臂丛神经麻醉的效果。66例接受上肢手术的患者被纳入一项双盲、随机、多中心试验。随后,5例患者因各种原因被排除。在其余患者中,30例接受40ml 0.5%罗哌卡因,31例接受40ml 0.5%布比卡因。采用外周神经刺激器,通过腋路运用标准化技术实施臂丛神经阻滞。研究的参数包括感觉和运动阻滞的频率、起效时间和持续时间、麻醉质量以及任何不良事件的发生情况。对臂丛神经的六条主要神经分别进行研究。罗哌卡因组每条神经达到麻醉的频率为70%至90%,布比卡因组为81%至87%。罗哌卡因麻醉的中位起效时间为10至20分钟,布比卡因麻醉的中位起效时间为10至30分钟;罗哌卡因麻醉的中位持续时间为5.3至8.7小时,布比卡因麻醉的中位持续时间为6.9至20.3小时。运动阻滞在肘部、腕部和手部进行评估,罗哌卡因组完全达到运动阻滞的比例为60%至73%,布比卡因组为55%至71%。罗哌卡因运动阻滞的中位持续时间为6.5至7.5小时,布比卡因运动阻滞的中位持续时间为6.0至9.0小时。这些参数无统计学差异。布比卡因导致腕部(6.8对16.4小时)和手部(6.7对12.3小时)部分运动阻滞的持续时间明显更长。0.5%罗哌卡因和0.5%布比卡因作为长效局部麻醉药用于腋路臂丛神经阻滞时似乎同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验