Suppr超能文献

罗哌卡因7.5毫克/毫升与布比卡因5毫克/毫升用于肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的比较研究

Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml versus bupivacaine 5 mg/ml for interscalene brachial plexus block--a comparative study.

作者信息

Hofmann-Kiefer K, Herbrich C, Seebauer A, Schwender D, Peter K

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Jun;30(3):331-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0203000311.

Abstract

We investigated ropivacaine 75 mg/ml in comparison with bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in patients receiving interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) and general anaesthesia. In this randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial, each patient received an ISB block according to the technique originally described by Winnie and a catheter technique as per Meier. The rapidity of onset and the quality of sensory and motor block were determined. After general anaesthesia had been induced further parameters evaluated were consumption of local anaesthetic, opioid and neuromuscular blocking drug. After arrival in the recovery room, the patients were assessed for intensity of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS). One hundred and twenty patients were included in the study. The onset and development of sensory block was similar in both groups. Development and quality of motor block was also nearly identical for both local anaesthetics. Consumption of neuromuscular blocking drug and opioid did not differ between ropivacaine and bupivacaine. In the recovery room the mean pain score was less than 25 in both groups. There were no significant differences in terms of onset and quality of sensory or motor block during the intraoperative and early postoperative period. In addition we did not identify any side-effects related to the administration of the local anaesthetics. Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5mg/ml proved to be nearly indistinguishable when administered for interscalene brachial plexus block.

摘要

我们在接受肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞(ISB)和全身麻醉的患者中,对75毫克/毫升的罗哌卡因与5毫克/毫升的布比卡因进行了研究比较。在这项随机、双盲、前瞻性临床试验中,每位患者均按照Winnie最初描述的技术接受ISB阻滞,并采用Meier所述的导管技术。测定起效速度以及感觉和运动阻滞的质量。诱导全身麻醉后,评估的其他参数包括局部麻醉药、阿片类药物和神经肌肉阻滞药的消耗量。患者进入恢复室后,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。120例患者纳入本研究。两组感觉阻滞的起效和发展相似。两种局部麻醉药的运动阻滞发展和质量也几乎相同。罗哌卡因和布比卡因之间神经肌肉阻滞药和阿片类药物的消耗量没有差异。在恢复室,两组的平均疼痛评分均低于25分。术中及术后早期,感觉或运动阻滞的起效和质量方面均无显著差异。此外,我们未发现与局部麻醉药给药相关的任何副作用。当用于肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞时,7.5毫克/毫升的罗哌卡因和5毫克/毫升的布比卡因几乎没有区别。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验