Suppr超能文献

关于干扰素-α2a联合阿维A与干扰素-α2a联合补骨脂素紫外线A光化学疗法治疗Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤患者的前瞻性随机多中心临床试验。

Prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial on the use of interferon -2a plus acitretin versus interferon -2a plus PUVA in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma stages I and II.

作者信息

Stadler R, Otte H G, Luger T, Henz B M, Kühl P, Zwingers T, Sterry W

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany, USA.

出版信息

Blood. 1998 Nov 15;92(10):3578-81.

PMID:9808550
Abstract

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) constitutes a malignant proliferative disease involving mostly CD4(+) T cells arising in the skin. Because of the lack of curative treatment options, interferons (IFN) have been introduced into the therapy of CTCL. Although effective even in advanced disease, response rates were about 50% and the duration of response was short. To improve the results of interferon monotherapy, combinations of IFN with oral photochemotherapy (PUVA) or retinoids were investigated in nonrandomized trials showing higher response rates. We have therefore conducted this prospective randomized multicenter trial to compare these two combination therapies, ie, IFN plus PUVA and IFN plus acitretin. IFN -2a was administered at 9 MU three times weekly subcutaneously in both groups, with lower increasing doses during the first week. Photochemotherapy was applied after oral intake of 8-methoxypsoralen (0.6 mg/kg body weight) 5x weekly during the first 4 weeks, 3x weekly from weeks 5 through 23, and 2x weekly from weeks 24 through 48, with escalating doses beginning with 0.25 J/cm2. Twenty-five milligrams of acitretin was administered daily during the first week, and 50 mg was administered from weeks 2 through 48. Of 98 patients randomized in this study, 82 stage I and II patients were evaluable: 40 in the IFN+PUVA group and 42 in the IFN+acitretin group. With 70% complete remissions in the IFN+PUVA group, this treatment was significantly superior to the IFN+acitretin group with only 38.1% complete remissions. Time to response was significantly shorter in the IFN+PUVA group, with 18.6 weeks compared with 21.8 weeks in the IFN+acitretin group. Side effects were mostly mild to moderate and did not differ significantly in both treatment groups. However, there were more adverse events leading to study discontinuation in the IFN+acitretin group. Based on these findings, we conclude that IFN plus oral photochemotherapy is superior to IFN plus acitretin, inducing more complete remissions in patients with CTCL stages I and II.

摘要

皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤(CTCL)是一种恶性增殖性疾病,主要累及皮肤中产生的CD4(+) T细胞。由于缺乏治愈性治疗方案,干扰素(IFN)已被引入CTCL的治疗。尽管即使在晚期疾病中也有效,但缓解率约为50%,且缓解持续时间较短。为了提高干扰素单药治疗的效果,在非随机试验中研究了干扰素与口服光化学疗法(PUVA)或维甲酸的联合应用,显示出更高的缓解率。因此,我们进行了这项前瞻性随机多中心试验,以比较这两种联合疗法,即干扰素加PUVA和干扰素加阿维A。两组均每周3次皮下注射9 MU的IFN -2a,第一周剂量逐渐增加。在第1至4周,每周5次口服8-甲氧基补骨脂素(0.6 mg/kg体重)后进行光化学疗法,第5至23周每周3次,第24至48周每周2次,起始剂量为0.25 J/cm2,剂量逐渐增加。第一周每天服用25毫克阿维A,第2至48周服用50毫克。在本研究随机分组的98例患者中,82例I期和II期患者可评估:IFN+PUVA组40例,IFN+阿维A组42例。IFN+PUVA组的完全缓解率为70%,该治疗明显优于IFN+阿维A组,后者的完全缓解率仅为38.1%。IFN+PUVA组的缓解时间明显更短,为18.6周,而IFN+阿维A组为21.8周。副作用大多为轻度至中度,两组无明显差异。然而,IFN+阿维A组有更多导致研究中断的不良事件。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,干扰素加口服光化学疗法优于干扰素加阿维A,在CTCL I期和II期患者中诱导更多的完全缓解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验