Howe S L, Delfino R J, Taylor T H, Anton-Culver H
Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, 92182, USA.
Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 1):674-80. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0343.
Mass screening for cervical cancer has considerably reduced invasive cancer rates; however, Hispanic Americans have not fully benefited. This study examined the relationship of demographic, socioeconomic, and acculturation factors to diagnostic stage prior to preventive interventions in a large Hispanic community (San Diego, CA, 1988-1991).
Age-adjusted incidence rates (IR) were estimated for three subareas: Hispanic community targeted with interventions, comparison Hispanic community, and remainder of county. Incident cases of cervical cancer in the California Cancer Registry were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRR) of in situ to invasive stage cancer and estimate differences in early detection between Hispanics and white non-Hispanics. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the relationship of cancer stage to census-linked income, education, poverty status, foreign birth, and language spoken.
The in situ cervical cancer IR is significantly lower for Hispanics than for white non-Hispanics in all three regions (P < 0.05). The overall IRR is 3.65 (95% CI 3.19, 4.18) for white non-Hispanics compared with 1.09 (95% CI 0.86, 1.38) for Hispanics. Hispanics in census tracts in the highest versus remaining quartiles for percentage of language-isolated households are at greater risk for invasive stage (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.27, 3. 40). White non-Hispanic women residing in census tracts in the highest versus lowest quartile of adults with less than 12 years education are at greater risk for invasive stage (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.31, 3.38).
Results show efforts aimed at cervical cancer early detection for Hispanic women are needed and well targeted. White non-Hispanic women in low-education communities are also at risk. Population-based methods in this study can focus efforts in communities needing preventive interventions.
宫颈癌大规模筛查已显著降低浸润性癌发病率;然而,西班牙裔美国人尚未充分受益。本研究调查了在一个大型西班牙裔社区(加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥,1988 - 1991年)中,人口统计学、社会经济和文化适应因素与预防性干预前诊断阶段的关系。
对三个分区估计年龄调整发病率(IR):接受干预的西班牙裔社区、对照西班牙裔社区以及县内其他地区。利用加利福尼亚癌症登记处的宫颈癌发病病例计算原位癌与浸润性癌的发病率比(IRR),并估计西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人在早期检测方面的差异。采用多因素逻辑回归分析癌症分期与普查关联的收入、教育程度、贫困状况、外国出生及所讲语言之间的关系。
在所有三个地区,西班牙裔原位宫颈癌发病率均显著低于非西班牙裔白人(P < 0.05)。非西班牙裔白人的总体IRR为3.65(95%可信区间3.19,4.18),而西班牙裔为1.09(95%可信区间0.86,1.38)。语言孤立家庭比例处于最高四分位数与其余四分位数的普查区中的西班牙裔,患浸润性癌的风险更高(比值比 = 2.10,95%可信区间1.27,3.40)。居住在成年人受教育年限低于12年的最高四分位数与最低四分位数普查区的非西班牙裔白人女性,患浸润性癌的风险更高(比值比 = 2.10,95%可信区间1.31,3.38)。
结果表明,针对西班牙裔女性宫颈癌早期检测的努力是必要且目标明确的。低教育社区的非西班牙裔白人女性也面临风险。本研究基于人群的方法可将工作重点放在需要预防性干预的社区。