Di Girolamo E, Di Iorio C, Sabatini P, Leonzio L, Barsotti A
Dipartimento di Cardiologia Medica e Chirurgica, Università degli Studi G D'Annunzio, Chieti.
Cardiologia. 1998 Aug;43(8):833-7.
Head-up tilt test was introduced in clinical practice to assess vasovagal syncope and its use has further been extended to evaluate the efficacy of drug administration in these patients. Nevertheless, the effects of tilt test on vasovagal syncope have never been compared with those obtained by ethylephrine or propranolol administration. One hundred and sixty-nine consecutive patients with vasovagal syncope and positive baseline or nitrate-potentiated tilt test (60 degrees upright position for 45 min, or until syncope occurred; 5 mg sublingual isosorbide dinitrate administration if no symptoms occurred) were randomly distributed among three groups: Group A (57 control patients discharged without medical therapy); Group B (56 patients discharged with 75 mg/die ethylephrine); Group C (56 patients discharged with 80 mg/die propranolol). Tilt test was repeated after 1 month, while clinical outcome was evaluated monthly for a mean follow-up of 37.1 +/- 15.6 months. No significant differences in acute tilt-induced syncope recurrence rates were obtained among groups at test repetition since 70.2% of Group A, 69.6% of Group B and 62.5% of Group C experienced syncope. At 3-year follow-up 82.4% of Group A, 83.9% of Group B and 87.5% of Group C (NS among groups) remained symptom free, the most important clinical result being obtained in untreated patients. These data suggest that tilt test execution may prevent syncope recurrence as ethylephrine or propranolol administration. Irrespective of the therapeutical choice, the "controlled reproduction" of symptoms and some psychophysical training of patients to avoid precipitating circumstances, to recognize early symptoms promptly to be reverted by Trendelemburg position, may produce the same clinical improvement as (empiric) ethylephrine or propranolol therapy.
头高位倾斜试验被引入临床实践以评估血管迷走性晕厥,其应用进一步扩展至评估这些患者药物治疗的疗效。然而,倾斜试验对血管迷走性晕厥的影响从未与去氧肾上腺素或普萘洛尔给药所获得的影响进行比较。169例连续的血管迷走性晕厥患者,基线或硝酸酯增强倾斜试验阳性(60度直立位45分钟,或直至晕厥发生;若无症状则舌下含服5mg硝酸异山梨酯),被随机分为三组:A组(57例对照患者,未接受药物治疗出院);B组(56例患者,以75mg/日的剂量服用去氧肾上腺素出院);C组(56例患者,以80mg/日的剂量服用普萘洛尔出院)。1个月后重复倾斜试验,同时每月评估临床结局,平均随访37.1±15.6个月。在重复试验时,各组间急性倾斜诱发的晕厥复发率无显著差异,因为A组70.2%、B组69.6%和C组62.5%的患者发生了晕厥。在3年随访时,A组82.4%、B组83.9%和C组87.5%(组间无显著性差异)仍无症状,未治疗患者取得了最重要的临床结果。这些数据表明,进行倾斜试验可能与给予去氧肾上腺素或普萘洛尔一样预防晕厥复发。无论治疗选择如何,症状的“控制性再现”以及对患者进行一些心理生理训练以避免诱发情况、及时识别早期症状以便通过头低脚高位恢复,可能产生与(经验性的)去氧肾上腺素或普萘洛尔治疗相同的临床改善效果。