Søgaard K, Christensen H, Fallentin N, Mizuno M, Quistorff B, Sjøgaard G
Department of Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Copenhagen O, Denmark.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Oct;78(5):411-6. doi: 10.1007/s004210050439.
Muscle activity was recorded from the flexor carpi radialis muscle during static and dynamic-concentric wrist flexion in six subjects, who had exhibited large differences in histochemically identified muscle fibre composition. Motor unit recruitment patterns were identified by sampling 310 motor units and counting firing rates in pulses per second (pps). During concentric wrist flexion at 30% of maximal exercise intensity the mean firing rate was 27 (SD 13) pps. This was around twice the value of 12 (SD 5) pps recorded during sustained static contraction at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, despite a larger absolute force level during the static contraction. A similar pattern of higher firing rates during dynamic exercise was seen when concentric wrist flexion at 60% of maximal exercise intensity [30 (SD 14) pps] was compared with sustained static contraction at 60% of maximal voluntary contraction [19 (SD 8) pps]. The increase in dynamic exercise intensity was accomplished by recruitment of additional motor units rather than by increasing the firing rate as during static contractions. No difference in mean firing rates was found among subjects with different muscle fibre composition, who had previously exhibited marked differences in metabolic response during corresponding dynamic contractions. It was concluded that during submaximal dynamic contractions motor unit firing rate cannot be deduced from observations during static contractions and that muscle fibre composition may play a minor role.
在六名受试者进行静态和动态向心腕关节屈曲时,记录了桡侧腕屈肌的肌肉活动,这些受试者在组织化学鉴定的肌肉纤维组成上表现出很大差异。通过对310个运动单位进行采样并以每秒脉冲数(pps)计算放电率,确定运动单位募集模式。在最大运动强度的30%进行向心腕关节屈曲时,平均放电率为27(标准差13)pps。这大约是在最大自主收缩的30%进行持续静态收缩时记录到的12(标准差5)pps的两倍,尽管静态收缩时的绝对力水平更大。当将最大运动强度的60%进行向心腕关节屈曲时的放电率[30(标准差14)pps]与最大自主收缩的60%进行持续静态收缩时的放电率[19(标准差8)pps]相比较时,在动态运动中也观察到了类似的较高放电率模式。动态运动强度的增加是通过募集额外的运动单位来实现的,而不是像静态收缩时那样通过增加放电率。在肌肉纤维组成不同的受试者中,未发现平均放电率有差异,这些受试者在相应的动态收缩过程中先前在代谢反应方面表现出明显差异。得出的结论是,在次最大动态收缩期间,不能从静态收缩期间的观察结果推断运动单位放电率,并且肌肉纤维组成可能起次要作用。