Biomechanics Laboratory, Bioscience Department, Physical Education and Sports School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Mar 1;8(1):24-9. eCollection 2009.
Incline Dumbbell Curl (IDC) and Dumbbell Preacher Curl (DPC) are two variations of the standard Dumbbell Biceps Curl (DBC), generally applied to optimize biceps brachii contribution for elbow flexion by fixing shoulder at a specific angle. The aim of this study is to identify changes in the neuromuscular activity of biceps brachii long head for IDC, DPC and DBC exercises, by taking into account the changes in load moment arm and muscle length elicited by each dumbbell curl protocol. A single cycle (concentric-eccentric) of DBC, IDC and DPC, was applied to 22 subjects using a submaximal load of 40% estimated from an isometric MVC test. The neuromuscular activity of biceps brachii long head was compared by further partitioning each contraction into three phases, according to individual elbow joint range of motion. Although all protocols elicited a considerable level of activation of the biceps brachii muscle (at least 50% of maximum RMS), the contribution of this muscle for elbow flexion/extension varied among exercises. The submaximal elbow flexion (concentric) elicited neuro muscular activity up to 95% of the maximum RMS value during the final phase of IDC and DBC and 80% for DPC at the beginning of the movement. All exercises showed significant less muscle activity for the elbow extension (eccentric). The Incline Dumbbell Curl and the classical Dumbbell Biceps Curl resulted in similar patterns of biceps brachii activation for the whole range of motion, whereas Dumbbell Preacher Curl elicited high muscle activation only for a short range of elbow joint angle. Key pointsThe Incline Dumbbell Curl and the Dumbbell Biceps Curl resulted in a considerable neuromuscular effort throughout the whole elbow range of motion.The Incline Dumbbell Curl and the Dumbbell Biceps Curl may be preferable for the improvement of biceps brachii force in training programs.
哑铃弯举(IDC)和牧师凳弯举(DPC)是标准哑铃二头肌弯举(DBC)的两种变体,通常用于通过将肩部固定在特定角度来优化二头肌对肘部弯曲的贡献。本研究旨在通过考虑每个哑铃弯举方案引起的负荷力矩臂和肌肉长度的变化,确定 IDC、DPC 和 DBC 运动中二头肌长头的神经肌肉活动变化。使用从等长 MVC 测试中估计的 40%的亚最大负荷,对 22 名受试者进行了 DBC、IDC 和 DPC 的单次循环(向心-离心)。根据个体肘部关节活动范围,将每个收缩进一步分为三个阶段,比较二头肌长头的神经肌肉活动。尽管所有方案都引起了二头肌相当高的激活水平(至少为最大 RMS 的 50%),但该肌肉对肘部弯曲/伸展的贡献在运动之间有所不同。亚最大肘部弯曲(向心)在 IDC 和 DBC 的最后阶段引起了高达 95%的最大 RMS 值的神经肌肉活动,而在运动开始时 DPC 引起了 80%的神经肌肉活动。所有运动在肘部伸展(离心)时都显示出明显较少的肌肉活动。倾斜哑铃弯举和经典哑铃二头肌弯举在整个运动范围内引起了相似的二头肌激活模式,而牧师凳弯举仅在短范围的肘部关节角度内引起了高肌肉激活。要点:
倾斜哑铃弯举和哑铃二头肌弯举在整个肘部运动范围内都产生了相当大的神经肌肉努力。
倾斜哑铃弯举和哑铃二头肌弯举可能更适合在训练计划中提高二头肌的力量。