Van Zandvoort M J, Kappelle L J, Algra A, De Haan E H
University Department of Neurology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;65(5):697-702. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.5.697.
The long term outcome after a single symptomatic lacunar infarct may be less favourable than is generally assumed. Patients often present with complaints such as fatigue or "being different from before the stroke", for which there are no obvious physical explanations. Although cognitive functioning is considered normal in most patients with lacunar infarction in the internal capsule or corona radiata, a study was carried out to determine if subclinical changes in mental or emotional function can explain these vague complaints characteristic for their disablement.
Sixteen patients, each with a single symptomatic supratentorial lacunar infarct, and 16 matched healthy controls were examined with an extensive neuropsychological screening battery and a standardised questionnaire aimed at emotional problems. The mean number of correct responses was calculated for each subject and averaged within each group.
Although, on the whole, there were no differences in performance, patients' results on the following tasks in different modalities showed evidence for decreased performance under relatively more demanding conditions: line orientation task (mean difference (MD) 261 ms; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 94 to 428), Rey-Osterrieth delayed recall (MD-3.8, 95% CI -7.5 to 0.0), visual elevator subtest of the everyday attention task (EAT) (MD -0.7, 95% CI -1.5 to 0.1), lottery subtest of the EAT (MD -0.6, 95% CI -1.3 to 0.1) and WAIS similarities (MD -3.2 95% CI -6.3 to 0.1). Patients also more often had emotional disturbances than controls.
Both subtle cognitive impairments and emotional disturbances may play a part in the decreased competence in everyday life of patients with a supratentorial lacunar infarct.
单次症状性腔隙性脑梗死的长期预后可能比一般认为的更不理想。患者常出现疲劳或“与中风前不同”等症状,而这些症状并无明显的身体原因可解释。尽管大多数内囊或放射冠腔隙性梗死患者的认知功能被认为正常,但仍开展了一项研究,以确定心理或情感功能的亚临床变化是否能解释这些因残疾而出现的模糊症状。
对16例单次症状性幕上腔隙性脑梗死患者和16例匹配的健康对照者进行了广泛的神经心理学筛查测试和针对情绪问题的标准化问卷调查。计算每组中每个受试者的正确反应平均数。
总体而言,两组表现无差异,但患者在以下不同模式任务中的结果显示,在要求相对较高的条件下表现有所下降:直线定向任务(平均差(MD)261毫秒;95%置信区间(95%CI)94至428)、雷-奥斯特里思延迟回忆(MD -3.8,95%CI -7.5至0.0)、日常注意力任务(EAT)的视觉电梯子测试(MD -0.7,95%CI -1.5至0.1)、EAT的抽奖子测试(MD -0.6,95%CI -1.3至0.1)和韦氏成人智力量表相似性测试(MD -3.2,95%CI -6.3至0.1)。患者出现情绪障碍的频率也高于对照组。
轻微的认知障碍和情绪障碍都可能导致幕上腔隙性脑梗死患者日常生活能力下降。