School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3):315-22. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827deb85.
To quantitatively characterize domain-specific cognition in individuals with symptomatic lacunar stroke in a systematic review.
Systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were conducted. Inclusion criteria were all articles published prior to December 2011 evaluating domain-specific cognitive status in individuals with a symptomatic lacunar infarct. Data extraction identified cognitive domains with reported impairment and effect size calculations and heterogeneity analyses were completed to assess the magnitude of this impairment for all studies with control group data.
Results of the search yielded 12 cross-sectional and 5 longitudinal studies that met inclusion criteria. Effect size calculations revealed small to medium effect sizes (ES) estimations for impairment after stroke in the domains of executive function (ES -0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.83, -0.50), memory (ES -0.55, 95% CI -0.96, -0.13), language (ES -0.63, 95% CI -0.92, -0.33), attention (ES -0.37, 95% CI -0.67, -0.07), and visuospatial abilities (ES -0.61, 95% CI -1.03, 0.19), and large effect sizes for global cognition (ES -0.90, 95% CI -1.48, -0.31) and information processing speed (ES -0.93, 95% CI -1.63, -0.23). Heterogeneity analyses revealed that a subset of these domains were heterogeneous and identified moderating factors accounting for this heterogeneity.
Results of this systematic review are consistent with previous characterizations of cognitive impairment associated with lacunar strokes. However, impaired cognition in this stroke subtype appears less selective than previously thought, involving all major cognitive domains.
通过系统评价定量描述有症状腔隙性卒中患者的特定领域认知功能。
系统检索 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库。纳入标准为所有在 2011 年 12 月前发表的评估有症状腔隙性梗死患者特定领域认知状态的文章。数据提取确定了报道的认知障碍领域,并进行效应量计算和异质性分析,以评估具有对照组数据的所有研究的这种损害的程度。
搜索结果产生了 12 项横断面研究和 5 项纵向研究,符合纳入标准。效应量计算显示,在执行功能(ES=-0.44,95%置信区间[CI]-0.83,-0.50)、记忆(ES=-0.55,95%CI-0.96,-0.13)、语言(ES=-0.63,95%CI-0.92,-0.33)、注意力(ES=-0.37,95%CI-0.67,-0.07)和视空间能力(ES=-0.61,95%CI-1.03,0.19)等领域,卒中后存在小到中等效应量(ES)估计值,而在总体认知(ES=-0.90,95%CI-1.48,-0.31)和信息处理速度(ES=-0.93,95%CI-1.63,-0.23)方面存在大的效应量。异质性分析显示,这些领域中的一部分存在异质性,并确定了导致这种异质性的调节因素。
本系统评价的结果与以前对腔隙性卒中相关认知障碍的描述一致。然而,这种卒中亚型的认知障碍似乎不如以前认为的那样具有选择性,涉及所有主要的认知领域。