Mummel P, Timmann D, Krause U W, Boering D, Thilmann A F, Diener H C, Horak F B
Department of Neurology, University of Essen, Germany.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;65(5):734-42. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.5.734.
To investigate the role of the cerebellum in postural adaptation for changes to the stimulus type of support surface displacements (backward translations v "toes up" rotations).
A group of 13 patients with chronic, isolated lesions of the cerebellum and 15 control subjects were tested. Automatic postural responses of the medial gastrocnemius and anterior tibial muscles were recorded. The first paradigm consisted of 10 rotational perturbations followed by 10 backward translations of the platform, and 10 backward translations followed by 10 rotations. The second paradigm consisted of 18 rotations and two randomly interposed translational perturbations, and 18 translations with two rotations randomly interposed.
When the type of perturbation changed from an expected translation to an unexpected rotation and vice versa both control subjects and cerebellar patients showed an immediate and significant change in the response amplitude of the medial gastrocnemius and at the same time an immediate and significant change in the response amplitude of the anterior tibial muscles. Neither controls nor cerebellar patients showed effects of prediction in surface displacements of unexpected types of perturbation. Both controls and cerebellar patients showed no gradual increase in the gastrocnemius response in subsequent trials of surface translations following a block of 10 surface rotations and no gradual increase in the response amplitude of the anterior tibial muscle in subsequent trials of surface rotations following a block of 10 surface translations.
Despite postural hypermetria, the integrity of the cerebellum does not seem critical for adaptation of postural synergies to changing stimulus types of surface displacements. The present results support previous findings suggesting that the main role of the cerebellum in automatic postural responses may be gain control.
研究小脑在支撑面位移刺激类型(向后平移与“脚趾向上”旋转)变化的姿势适应中的作用。
对一组13例慢性孤立性小脑损伤患者和15名对照受试者进行测试。记录腓肠肌内侧头和胫骨前肌的自动姿势反应。第一种模式包括10次旋转扰动,随后是平台的10次向后平移,以及10次向后平移,随后是10次旋转。第二种模式包括18次旋转和两次随机插入的平移扰动,以及18次平移和两次随机插入的旋转。
当扰动类型从预期的平移变为意外的旋转,反之亦然时,对照受试者和小脑损伤患者的腓肠肌内侧头反应幅度均立即出现显著变化,同时胫骨前肌反应幅度也立即出现显著变化。对照受试者和小脑损伤患者在意外类型扰动的表面位移中均未表现出预测效应。在10次表面旋转后的后续表面平移试验中,对照受试者和小脑损伤患者的腓肠肌反应均未逐渐增加;在10次表面平移后的后续表面旋转试验中,胫骨前肌反应幅度也未逐渐增加。
尽管存在姿势性动作过度,但小脑的完整性对于姿势协同适应表面位移变化的刺激类型似乎并不关键。目前的结果支持了先前的研究结果,表明小脑在自动姿势反应中的主要作用可能是增益控制。