Batt M E, Ugalde V, Anderson M W, Shelton D K
University of California, Davis, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Nov;30(11):1564-71. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199811000-00002.
The purpose of this prospective, observational study was to examine the relationship of clinical examination, plain radiograph (XR), triple-phase bone scan (TPBS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the investigation of patients presenting with acute shin splints.
23 subjects with exercise induced lower leg pain and diffuse tibial tenderness of less than 3 months' duration were recruited. Subjects were excluded if there was clinical evidence of compartment syndrome, muscle hernia, or stress fracture. Each subject underwent XR, TPBS, and MRI within 2 wk of physical examination. Four asymptomatic controls underwent TPBS and MRI. Clinical findings, XR, TPBS, and MRI findings were independently recorded using a consistent template and subsequently analyzed. A single consensus lesion was chosen that provided the greatest overlap and highest grade to allow comparison of clinical and imaging findings. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated from data relating to clinical findings and diagnostic imaging.
Eighteen subjects had bilateral symptoms and five unilateral with a mean duration of symptom of 5.4 wk (+/- 3.5). Of 41 symptomatic lower legs, there were TPBS abnormalities in 36 and MRI findings in 34. Analysis of clinical findings to TPBS and MRI demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 84%, 33% and 79%, 33%, respectively. Assuming TPBS as the "gold-standard," MRI findings demonstrated a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 67%. There was poor agreement between the grading of TPBS and MRI (k = 0.3). In the 5/46 asymptomatic limbs, 3/5 demonstrated uptake on bone scan and 4/5 signal change with MRI. Imaging abnormalities were similarly seen in the four control patients.
MRI may be used rather than TPBS and radiographs for evaluating acute tibial pain in athletes where avoidance of radiation exposure is desirable. Similar sensitivity and specificity may be expected from both investigations; however, in the light of abnormal TPBS and MRI findings in control and asymptomatic limbs, we recommend further studies be performed to define the extent of nonpathological TPBS and MRI changes.
这项前瞻性观察性研究的目的是探讨临床检查、X线平片(XR)、三相骨扫描(TPBS)和磁共振成像(MRI)在急性胫骨夹板患者检查中的关系。
招募了23名运动引起小腿疼痛且胫骨弥漫性压痛持续时间少于3个月的受试者。如果有骨筋膜室综合征、肌肉疝或应力性骨折的临床证据,则将受试者排除。每位受试者在体格检查后2周内接受XR、TPBS和MRI检查。四名无症状对照者接受TPBS和MRI检查。使用一致的模板独立记录临床发现、XR、TPBS和MRI发现,随后进行分析。选择一个单一的共识性病变,该病变具有最大的重叠度和最高的分级,以便比较临床和影像学发现。根据与临床发现和诊断性影像学相关的数据计算敏感性和特异性。
18名受试者有双侧症状,5名单侧症状,平均症状持续时间为5.4周(±3.5)。在41条有症状的小腿中,36条有TPBS异常,34条有MRI发现。临床发现与TPBS和MRI的分析显示敏感性和特异性分别为84%、33%以及79%、33%。假设TPBS为“金标准”,MRI发现的敏感性为95%,特异性为67%。TPBS和MRI的分级之间一致性较差(k = 0.3)。在5/46条无症状肢体中,3/5在骨扫描上显示摄取,4/5在MRI上显示信号改变。四名对照患者也有类似的影像学异常。
在希望避免辐射暴露的运动员中,评估急性胫骨疼痛时可使用MRI而非TPBS和X线平片。两项检查可能具有相似的敏感性和特异性;然而,鉴于对照和无症状肢体中TPBS和MRI有异常发现,我们建议进行进一步研究以确定非病理性TPBS和MRI改变的程度。