Suppr超能文献

心电图触发的二维时间飞跃法与优化的对比增强三维磁共振血管造影在外周动脉成像中的比较

Electrocardiograph-triggered two-dimensional time-of-flight versus optimized contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the peripheral arteries.

作者信息

Vosshenrich R, Kopka L, Castillo E, Böttcher U, Graessner J, Grabbe E

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, Siemens, Germany.

出版信息

Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 Oct;16(8):887-92. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(98)00078-2.

Abstract

We determined whether the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the peripheral run-off vessels can be improved by using contrast-enhanced (CE) three-dimensional (3D) technique in comparison to electrocardiograph (ECG)-triggered two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight (TOF) technique. In a prospective study 20 patients with occlusions of the pelvic and/or femoral arteries underwent a CE 3D MRA (repetition time (TR): 5 ms, (TE) echo time: 2 ms, flip angle (FA): 30 degrees ) and an ECG-triggered 2D time-of-flight (TOF) technique (TR: 408 resp. 608 ms, TE: 7 ms, FA: 70 degrees) of the run-off vessels on a 1.5 T MR system. Each patient received a contrast material volume of 0.15 mmol/kg of body weight of gadolinium (Gd)/DTPA using an automatic injector. The tube system to the patient was flushed by 50 mL of a saline solution applied with the same injection rate as the contrast material administration. The start of the 3D MR sequence was tailored individually to the applied contrast material after determination of circulation times by a prior bolus. All patients underwent each conventional or digital arteriography for comparison, as well. The visualization of the run-off vessels was ranked on a scale of 0-3 (0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = excellent) by three blinded reviewers. They also graded the vascular segments as either occluded or significantly altered (>50% reduction in diameter) or free of significant stenosis. CE 3D MRA was significantly faster in imaging the run-off vessels in comparison to the ECG-triggered 2D TOF technique. All 160 vascular segments were visualized with the 3D method, whereas only 142/160 segments were seen with 2D technique. The resulting image quality ranking of all vascular segments was significantly higher (p < 0.05) using CE 3D MRA (2.8) than with the 2D TOF technique (2.4). The detection of the stenoses was possible with both techniques. The grading of seven of seven stenoses was correct with 3D method and in five of seven cases with the 2D TOF technique. All vessel occlusions were detected by using both techniques. Small collaterals were visualized in more detail with the CE 3D MR angiography. These data demonstrate an improvement in image quality and accuracy of MRA of the peripheral arteries using a CE 3D technique in comparison to an ECG-triggered 2D TOF sequence.

摘要

我们比较了与心电图(ECG)触发的二维(2D)时间飞跃(TOF)技术相比,使用对比增强(CE)三维(3D)技术是否能提高磁共振血管造影(MRA)在外周流出血管中的准确性。在一项前瞻性研究中,20例盆腔和/或股动脉闭塞患者在1.5T磁共振系统上接受了CE 3D MRA(重复时间(TR):5ms,回波时间(TE):2ms,翻转角(FA):30度)和ECG触发的2D时间飞跃(TOF)技术(TR:408或608ms,TE:7ms,FA:70度)对流出血管的检查。每位患者使用自动注射器接受0.15mmol/kg体重的钆(Gd)/二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)对比剂。连接患者的管道系统用50mL生理盐水冲洗,冲洗速率与对比剂注射速率相同。在通过预先注射团注确定循环时间后,3D磁共振序列的开始时间根据所使用的对比剂进行个体化调整。所有患者也都接受了传统或数字血管造影检查以作比较。三位盲法评审员将流出血管的可视化程度按0 - 3级进行评分(0 = 差,1 =一般,2 = 好,3 = 优)。他们还将血管段分为闭塞、显著改变(直径减少>50%)或无明显狭窄。与ECG触发的2D TOF技术相比,CE 3D MRA在对外周流出血管成像时明显更快。3D方法能显示所有160个血管段,而2D技术仅能显示142/160个血管段。使用CE 3D MRA(2.8)时,所有血管段的图像质量评分显著高于2D TOF技术(2.4)(p < 0.05)。两种技术都能检测到狭窄。3D方法对7个狭窄中的7个分级正确,2D TOF技术在7个病例中有5个分级正确。两种技术都检测到了所有血管闭塞。CE 3D磁共振血管造影能更清晰地显示小侧支血管。这些数据表明,与ECG触发的2D TOF序列相比,使用CE 3D技术可提高外周动脉MRA的图像质量和准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验