• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[玩具仿真手枪及其对听力的影响]

[Toy cap pistols and their effect on hearing].

作者信息

Fleischer G, Hoffmann E, Müller R, Lang R

机构信息

Arbeitsgruppe Hörforschung, Medizinisches Zentrum für Okologie, Klinikum der Universität Giessen.

出版信息

HNO. 1998 Sep;46(9):815-20. doi: 10.1007/s001060050318.

DOI:10.1007/s001060050318
PMID:9816536
Abstract

In order to understand the repeated occurrences of auditory impairments caused by toy pistols, an analysis of the circumstances involved was performed at Justus-Liebig University of Giessen. The acoustic impact of toy pistols on the ear was determined with a special measuring system for impulse noise. Results were compared with the acoustic impacts of the G3 common rifle of the German military on the ear of the soldier. It was apparent that all of the five randomly selected types of toy pistols were much louder than the military rifle, if fired close to the ear. The current standard of the European Union related to the safety of toys (EN 71-1) tolerates peaks of impulse noise from toy pistols that are actually illegal for workplaces without auditory protection. Measurements showed that the toy pistols tested were even louder than that tolerated by the EU standard. Problems related to acute acoustic trauma caused by these toys are discussed using recent examples. In order to prevent such injuries, we suggest limiting the loudness of the "worst case" instead of using unrealistic measurements.

摘要

为了解玩具手枪导致听力损伤反复出现的情况,吉森尤斯图斯-利比希大学对相关情况进行了分析。利用一种特殊的脉冲噪声测量系统测定了玩具手枪对耳朵的声学影响。将结果与德国军队的G3普通步枪对士兵耳朵的声学影响进行了比较。很明显,如果在耳朵附近开枪,随机挑选的五种玩具手枪的声音都比军用步枪大得多。欧盟现行的玩具安全标准(EN 71-1)允许玩具手枪产生的脉冲噪声峰值,而这种峰值在没有听觉保护的工作场所实际上是违法的。测量结果表明,测试的玩具手枪声音甚至比欧盟标准允许的还要大。本文通过最近的实例讨论了这些玩具造成急性声学创伤的相关问题。为防止此类伤害,我们建议限制“最坏情况”下的响度,而不是使用不切实际的测量方法。

相似文献

1
[Toy cap pistols and their effect on hearing].[玩具仿真手枪及其对听力的影响]
HNO. 1998 Sep;46(9):815-20. doi: 10.1007/s001060050318.
2
[Documentation of the effects of child cap pistols].
HNO. 1999 Jun;47(6):535-40. doi: 10.1007/s001060050420.
3
[How dangerous are toy cap pistols for hearing?].玩具气手枪对听力有多大危害?
HNO. 1998 Sep;46(9):784-5. doi: 10.1007/s001060050313.
4
Toy weapons and firecrackers: a source of hearing loss.
Laryngoscope. 1989 Mar;99(3):330-4. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198903000-00018.
5
Inner ear damage in children due to noise exposure from toy cap pistols and firecrackers: a retrospective review of 53 cases.
Noise Health. 2003 Jan-Mar;5(18):13-8.
6
Noise level analysis of commercially available toys.市售玩具的噪音水平分析
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1997 Aug 20;41(2):187-97. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(97)00083-9.
7
[Peak sound pressure levels of gunshots from starter's pistols].[发令手枪射击的峰值声压级]
HNO. 1998 Dec;46(12):986-92. doi: 10.1007/s001060050346.
8
Auditory risk estimates for youth target shooting.青少年射击的听觉风险评估。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S16-25. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.865845.
9
Systematic assessment of noise amplitude generated by toys intended for young children.系统评估供幼儿使用的玩具产生的噪声幅度。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Jun;148(6):1043-7. doi: 10.1177/0194599813482293. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
10
In-ear and on-body measurements of impulse-noise exposure.入耳和体上的脉冲噪声暴露测量。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Feb;58(sup1):S49-S57. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1534012. Epub 2019 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Current aspects of hearing loss from occupational and leisure noise.职业和休闲噪音导致听力损失的当前状况
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;3:Doc06. Epub 2004 Dec 28.
2
[Inner ear damage due to leisure and broadband noise. An experimental study on initial and permanent functional and morphological damage].[休闲与宽带噪声导致的内耳损伤。初始和永久性功能及形态损伤的实验研究]
HNO. 2004 Apr;52(4):301-10. doi: 10.1007/s00106-003-1042-4.