Velmahos G C, Arroyo H, Ramicone E, Cornwell E E, Murray J A, Asensio J A, Berne T V, Demetriades D
Department of Surgery, University of Southern California and the Los Angeles County+USC Medical Center, 90033, USA.
Am J Surg. 1998 Oct;176(4):324-9; discussion 329-30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00208-6.
Early fracture fixation in blunt trauma patients is suggested to decrease postoperative morbidity by allowing early mobilization and reducing the release of harmful inflammatory mediators. Some studies have challenged this concept in the presence of severe associated injuries, and especially head trauma.
The records of 47 consecutive blunt trauma patients with severe head injuries, as defined by a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) < or =8 and a head Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) > or =3, and long bone fractures requiring surgical fixation were reviewed. The study population was divided into the early fixation (EF) group, consisting of 22 patients who underwent fracture fixation within 24 hours of admission (mean time 17 +/- 8.5 hours); and the late fixation (LF) group, consisting of 25 patients, who had orthopedic repair at a later time (mean 143 +/- 178 hours).
The two groups were similar in terms of overall injury severity, neurologic injuries, hemodynamic and neurologic status on admission, and operations received. Patients in the EF group had a higher injury severity of extremity fractures (extremity AIS: 2.9 +/- 0.2 versus 2.4 +/- 0.5, P = 0.0002) and a higher incidence of open fractures (72% versus 36%, P = 0.02). There was no difference in intraoperative and postoperative hypoxic and hypotensive episodes. Neurologic, orthopedic, and general complications were the same between the two groups. The mean GCS on discharge was 12 +/- 3 for both groups with equal distribution among patients. Although there was a trend toward longer hospital stay (25 +/- 17 versus 17 +/- 10 days, P = 0.057) among LF patients, mechanical ventilation days, length of stay, and mortality were not different.
Timing of fracture fixation in this group of blunt trauma patients with severe head injuries did not influence morbidity, mortality, or neurologic outcome.
对于钝性创伤患者,早期骨折固定被认为可通过促进早期活动及减少有害炎症介质的释放来降低术后发病率。一些研究对存在严重合并伤尤其是头部创伤时的这一概念提出了质疑。
回顾了47例连续的钝性创伤患者的记录,这些患者因格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)≤8且头部简明损伤评分(AIS)≥3而被定义为重度颅脑损伤,同时伴有需要手术固定的长骨骨折。研究人群被分为早期固定(EF)组,包括22例在入院24小时内接受骨折固定的患者(平均时间17±8.5小时);以及晚期固定(LF)组,包括25例在稍后时间接受骨科修复的患者(平均143±178小时)。
两组在总体损伤严重程度、神经损伤、入院时的血流动力学和神经状态以及接受的手术方面相似。EF组患者的四肢骨折损伤严重程度更高(四肢AIS:2.9±0.2对2.4±0.5,P = 0.0002),开放性骨折发生率更高(72%对36%,P = 0.02)。术中及术后缺氧和低血压发作情况无差异。两组的神经、骨科和全身并发症相同。两组出院时的平均GCS均为12±3,患者分布均匀。尽管LF组患者的住院时间有延长趋势(25±17天对17±10天,P = 0.057),但机械通气天数、住院时间和死亡率并无差异。
对于这组重度颅脑损伤的钝性创伤患者,骨折固定时机并未影响发病率、死亡率或神经功能结局。