Hruby T
Washington State Department of Ecology SEA Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, Washington 98504, USA
Environ Manage. 1999 Jan;23(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s002679900168.
/ Many methods have been developed over the last two decades to provide information about wetland functions, but there has been little discussion of the models and algorithms used. Methods for generating information about wetlands were analyzed to understand their similarities, differences, and the type of information provided. Methods can first be grouped by the type of information they provide-classifications, characterizations, ratings, assessments, and evaluations. Methods that characterize, rate, or assess wetlands may generate information using one of two conceptual approaches-logic and mechanistic. Most methods that generate a numeric assessment of performance or value of wetland functions rely on the mechanistic approach to constructing models. Rapid assessment methods based on mechanistic models, however, do not assess the rates or dynamics of ecological processes occurring in wetlands. Rather, they provide a clear and concise way of organizing our current, and often subjective, knowledge about wetland functions. This is one limitation of current methods that is often misunderstood both by wetland managers and the scientific community. The advantages and limitations of the assumptions and the computational elements inherent in these approaches are discussed to provide wetland managers and regulators a better understanding of the information they are using. KEY WORDS: Wetlands; Functions; Assessment; Models; Methods
在过去二十年里,人们开发了许多方法来提供有关湿地功能的信息,但对于所使用的模型和算法却很少有讨论。对生成湿地信息的方法进行了分析,以了解它们的异同以及所提供信息的类型。方法首先可以根据它们提供的信息类型进行分组——分类、特征描述、评级、评估和评价。对湿地进行特征描述、评级或评估的方法可能使用两种概念方法之一来生成信息——逻辑方法和机理方法。大多数对湿地功能的性能或价值进行数值评估的方法都依赖于机理方法来构建模型。然而,基于机理模型的快速评估方法并不评估湿地中发生的生态过程的速率或动态。相反,它们提供了一种清晰简洁的方式来整理我们目前关于湿地功能的、往往是主观的知识。这是当前方法的一个局限性,湿地管理者和科学界常常对此存在误解。讨论了这些方法中固有的假设和计算要素的优缺点,以便湿地管理者和监管者更好地理解他们所使用的信息。关键词:湿地;功能;评估;模型;方法