Suppr超能文献

高强度运动训练对内皮依赖性运动诱导的血管舒张的影响。

Effects of intense exercise training on endothelium-dependent exercise-induced vasodilatation.

作者信息

Franke W D, Stephens G M, Schmid P G

机构信息

Department of Health and Human Performance, Iowa State University, Ames 50011, USA.

出版信息

Clin Physiol. 1998 Nov;18(6):521-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1998.00122.x.

Abstract

To determine whether intense exercise training affects exercise-induced vasodilatation, six subjects underwent 4 weeks of handgrip training at 70% of maximal voluntary contraction. Exercise forearm vascular conductance (FVC) responses to an endothelium-dependent vasodilator (acetylcholine, ACH; 15, 30, 60 micrograms min-1) and an endothelium-independent vasodilator (sodium nitroprusside, SNP; 1.6, 3.2, 6.4 micrograms min-1) and FVC after 10 min of forearm ischaemia were determined before and after training. Training elicited significant (P < 0.001) increases in grip strength (43.4 +/- 2.3 vs. 64.1 +/- 3.5 kg, before vs. after, mean +/- SEM), forearm circumference (26.7 +/- 0.4 vs. 27.9 +/- 0.4 cm) and maximal FVC (0.4630 +/- 0.0387 vs. 0.6258 +/- 0.0389 units, P < 0.05). Resting FVC did not change significantly with training (0.0723 +/- 0.0162 vs. 0.0985 +/- 0.0171 units, P > 0.4), but exercise FVC increased (0.1330 +/- 0.0190 vs. 0.2534 +/- 0.0387 units, P < 0.05). Before and after the training, ACH increased exercise FVC above the control (no drug) exercise FVC, whereas SNP did not. Training increased (P < 0.05) the exercise FVC responses to ACH (0.3344 +/- 0.1208 vs. 0.4303 +/- 0.0858 units, before vs. after training, 60 micrograms min-1) and SNP (0.2066 +/- 0.0849 vs. 0.3172 +/- 0.0628 units, 6.4 micrograms min-1). However, these increases were due to the increase in control (no drug) exercise FVC, as the drug-associated increase in exercise FVC above control did not differ between trials (P > 0.6). These results suggest that exercise FVC is increased by both exercise training and stimulating the release of endothelium-dependent vasodilators. However, training does not affect the vascular response to these vasodilators.

摘要

为了确定高强度运动训练是否会影响运动诱导的血管舒张,六名受试者进行了为期4周的握力训练,强度为最大自主收缩的70%。在训练前后,分别测定了运动前臂血管传导率(FVC)对内皮依赖性血管舒张剂(乙酰胆碱,ACH;15、30、60微克/分钟)和内皮非依赖性血管舒张剂(硝普钠,SNP;1.6、3.2、6.4微克/分钟)的反应,以及前臂缺血10分钟后的FVC。训练使握力显著增加(P < 0.001)(训练前为43.4±2.3千克,训练后为64.1±3.5千克,平均值±标准误),前臂周长增加(26.7±0.4厘米对27.9±0.4厘米),最大FVC增加(0.4630±0.0387单位对0.6258±0.0389单位,P < 0.05)。静息FVC在训练后无显著变化(0.0723±0.0162单位对0.0985±0.0171单位,P > 0.4),但运动FVC增加(0.1330±0.0190单位对0.2534±0.0387单位,P < 0.05)。训练前后,ACH使运动FVC高于对照(无药物)运动FVC,而SNP则不然。训练增加了(P < 0.05)运动FVC对ACH的反应(训练前60微克/分钟时为0.3344±0.1208单位,训练后为0.4303±0.0858单位)和对SNP的反应(6.4微克/分钟时为0.2066±0.0849单位对0.3172±0.0628单位)。然而,这些增加是由于对照(无药物)运动FVC的增加,因为试验之间药物相关的运动FVC高于对照的增加并无差异(P > 0.6)。这些结果表明,运动训练和刺激内皮依赖性血管舒张剂的释放均可增加运动FVC。然而,训练并不影响血管对这些血管舒张剂的反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验