Lindenmayer J P, Iskander A, Park M, Apergi F S, Czobor P, Smith R, Allen D
Psychopharmacology Research Unit, Manhattan Psychiatric Center, New York, NY 10035, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Oct;59(10):521-7. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n1005.
Few controlled studies have compared the efficacy of clozapine and risperidone in treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients. The present study investigates the efficacy of both clozapine and risperidone on psychopathologic and neurocognitive measures in a prospective 12-week open-label trial in treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients from state psychiatric hospitals.
Thirty-five DSM-IV schizophrenic patients with a documented history of nonresponse to typical neuroleptics were treated with either clozapine or risperidone. Response was assessed every 2 weeks by independent raters with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale, neurologic rating scales, and plasma drug levels. Neurocognitive tests were administered at baseline and week 12.
Both clozapine and risperidone brought about significant (p < .003) overall improvement in psychopathology. However, clozapine was numerically superior to risperidone on PANSS total scores and PANSS positive, negative, excitement, and cognitive factors. Extrapyramidal side effects were minimal for clozapine, whereas some were present for risperidone. Patients taking risperidone improved significantly in the beginning stages of the study and remained stable thereafter. Patients taking clozapine showed a gradual improvement that occurred over the entire length of the trial. Neurocognitive measures showed minimal improvement and did not differentiate between the 2 medication groups.
Both clozapine and risperidone were comparably effective across a wide spectrum of psychopathologic measures. While the efficacy of clozapine was only numerically superior to that of risperidone, it was associated with fewer extrapyramidal side effects and with progressive improvement over the 12-week treatment period, suggesting that in longer trials clozapine may prove to be superior to risperidone in neuroleptic-refractory patients.
很少有对照研究比较氯氮平和利培酮对难治性精神分裂症患者的疗效。本研究在一项针对州立精神病医院难治性精神分裂症患者的为期12周的前瞻性开放标签试验中,调查了氯氮平和利培酮在精神病理学和神经认知指标方面的疗效。
35名有对典型抗精神病药物无反应记录的DSM-IV精神分裂症患者接受了氯氮平或利培酮治疗。独立评估者每2周用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、临床总体印象(CGI)量表、神经学评定量表和血浆药物水平对反应进行评估。在基线和第12周进行神经认知测试。
氯氮平和利培酮均使精神病理学有显著(p <.003)的总体改善。然而,在PANSS总分以及PANSS阳性、阴性、兴奋和认知因子方面,氯氮平在数值上优于利培酮。氯氮平的锥体外系副作用最小,而利培酮则有一些此类副作用。服用利培酮的患者在研究开始阶段有显著改善,此后保持稳定。服用氯氮平的患者在整个试验过程中逐渐改善。神经认知指标改善甚微,且未在两个药物组之间显示出差异。
氯氮平和利培酮在广泛的精神病理学指标方面疗效相当。虽然氯氮平的疗效仅在数值上优于利培酮,但它与较少的锥体外系副作用相关,且在12周治疗期内逐步改善,这表明在更长时间的试验中,氯氮平在难治性患者中可能被证明比利培酮更具优势。