Chen T T, Ng T H
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 30;17(20):2301-12. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981030)17:20<2301::aid-sim927>3.0.co;2-x.
In the conduct of a phase II cancer clinical trial, patients usually enter in two stages. If the response rate from the first stage is low, then the study terminates. Within various two-stage designs, Simon proposed the optimal and minimax criteria. In the co-operative group setting, practical considerations make it difficult to arrive at the planned sample size exactly. Green and Dahlberg proposed and compared several flexible designs. In this paper, we explicitly define a flexible design as a collection of two-stage designs where the first stage size is in a set of consecutive values (n1, ..., nk) and the second stage size is also in another set of consecutive values (N1, ..., Nk), and each of k2 possible designs has the same probability of occurrence. We apply Simon's optimal and minimax criteria to flexible designs for phase II trials in order to minimize the number of patients tested on an ineffective drug.
在进行II期癌症临床试验时,患者通常分两个阶段入组。如果第一阶段的缓解率较低,那么研究就会终止。在各种两阶段设计中,西蒙提出了最优和极小极大标准。在合作组的情况下,实际考虑因素使得很难精确达到计划的样本量。格林和达尔伯格提出并比较了几种灵活设计。在本文中,我们明确将灵活设计定义为一组两阶段设计的集合,其中第一阶段的样本量取值于一组连续的值(n1, ..., nk),第二阶段的样本量取值于另一组连续的值(N1, ..., Nk),并且k2种可能设计中的每一种出现的概率相同。我们将西蒙的最优和极小极大标准应用于II期试验的灵活设计,以便将在无效药物上进行测试的患者数量降至最低。