Judson I, Maughan T, Beale P, Primrose J, Hoskin P, Hanwell J, Berry C, Walker M, Sutcliffe F
Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
Br J Cancer. 1998 Nov;78(9):1188-93. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.652.
This open-label, non-randomized, parallel-group trial investigated the pharmacokinetics of raltitrexed (Tomudex, formerly ZD1694) after a single intravenous dose of 3.0 mg m(-2), comparing eight cancer patients with mild to moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 25-65 ml min(-1)) with eight cancer patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance >65 ml min(-1)). The primary end points were area under the plasma raltitrexed concentration-time curve from the start of the infusion to the last determined concentration (AUC(0-tldc)) and AUC to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)); secondary end points were peak concentrations of raltitrexed (Cmax) and elimination half-life (t(1/2gamma)). The groups were compared statistically using analysis of covariance. The AUCs were greater for patients with renal impairment than for patients with normal renal function (2452.2 compared with 1247.3 ng h ml(-1) for AUC(0-tldc) (ratio 1.97; 95% CI 1.36-2.84); 2961.5 compared with 1457.0 ng h ml(-1) for AUC(0-infinity) (ratio 2.03; 1.25-3.29). These differences were statistically significant (P = 0.002 and P = 0.008 for AUC(0-tldc) and AUC(0-infinity) respectively. Terminal half-life was longer for the renally impaired patients (271.2 compared with 143.3; P = 0.030). There was no significant statistical difference between the groups for Cmax (652.9 compared with 564.7 ng ml(-1) for patients with impaired and normal renal function respectively: ratio 1.16; 0.91-1.46; P = 0.204). There was a clear relationship between raltitrexed clearance and creatinine clearance. Adverse events, severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) toxicity and hospitalization due to adverse events were more frequent in the group with renal impairment. Therefore, a reduction in raltitrexed dose and increased interval between doses is recommended for patients with mild to moderate renal impairment.
这项开放标签、非随机、平行组试验研究了单剂量静脉注射3.0 mg m(-2)雷替曲塞(商品名:拓优得,曾用名ZD1694)后的药代动力学,将8例轻度至中度肾功能损害(肌酐清除率25 - 65 ml min(-1))的癌症患者与8例肾功能正常(肌酐清除率>65 ml min(-1))的癌症患者进行比较。主要终点为从输注开始至最后测定浓度的血浆雷替曲塞浓度 - 时间曲线下面积(AUC(0 - tldc))和至无穷大的AUC(AUC(0 - infinity));次要终点为雷替曲塞的峰浓度(Cmax)和消除半衰期(t(1/2γ))。采用协方差分析对两组进行统计学比较。肾功能损害患者的AUC高于肾功能正常患者(AUC(0 - tldc)分别为2452.2与1247.3 ng h ml(-1)(比值1.97;95% CI 1.36 - 2.84);AUC(0 - infinity)分别为2961.5与1457.0 ng h ml(-1)(比值2.03;1.25 - 3.29)。这些差异具有统计学意义(AUC(0 - tldc)和AUC(0 - infinity)的P值分别为0.002和0.008)。肾功能损害患者的终末半衰期更长(分别为271.2与143.3;P = 0.030)。两组的Cmax无显著统计学差异(肾功能损害和正常患者分别为652.9与564.7 ng ml(-1):比值1.16;0.91 - 1.46;P = 0.204)。雷替曲塞清除率与肌酐清除率之间存在明确关系。肾功能损害组的不良事件、严重(WHO 3级或4级)毒性及因不良事件住院更为频繁。因此,对于轻度至中度肾功能损害患者,建议降低雷替曲塞剂量并延长给药间隔。