Bahng S C, VanHala S, Nelson V S, Hurvitz E A, Roloff D W, Grady E A, Lewis C C
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0230, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Nov;79(11):1367-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90229-5.
There are little data on the actual care given pediatric tracheostomy patients in their homes. Information on the use of supplies and on techniques and frequency of care is valuable for a better understanding of the needs of this population.
Questionnaires were distributed by mail or at clinic visits from May 1995 to June 1996 to a convenience sample of tracheotomized patients at the University of Michigan Pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinic.
Tertiary care clinic.
Clean technique for suctioning was reported by 96.7% of subjects and the rest reported sterile technique. Fifty percent of subjects reported reusing suction catheters. Cleaning solutions used to clean suction catheters for reuse varied. Tracheostomy tube reuse was reported by 55% of subjects. Sixty percent of those who reused tracheostomy tubes had had pneumonia within the previous year, whereas only 25% of those who never reused the tracheostomy tube had pneumonia in the same time period.
Suctioning frequency, suction catheter, and tracheostomy tube reuse and cleaning methods are variables that warrant further investigation of safety and efficacy.
关于小儿气管造口术患者在家中接受的实际护理的数据很少。了解用品的使用情况以及护理技术和频率,对于更好地了解这一人群的需求很有价值。
1995年5月至1996年6月,通过邮件或在诊所就诊时分发问卷,对密歇根大学儿科学物理医学与康复诊所的气管切开术患者进行便利抽样调查。
三级护理诊所。
96.7%的受试者报告采用清洁吸痰技术,其余报告采用无菌技术。50%的受试者报告重复使用吸痰导管。用于清洁重复使用的吸痰导管的清洁溶液各不相同。55%的受试者报告重复使用气管造口管。在重复使用气管造口管的患者中,60%在过去一年内患过肺炎,而在同一时期,从未重复使用气管造口管的患者中只有25%患过肺炎。
吸痰频率、吸痰导管、气管造口管的重复使用和清洁方法是值得进一步研究安全性和有效性的变量。