• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于全科医疗中患者优先事项的文献系统评价。第1部分:研究领域描述。

A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain.

作者信息

Wensing M, Jung H P, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R

机构信息

Centre for Quality of Care Research, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1573-88. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00222-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00222-6
PMID:9823053
Abstract

To make health care more responsive to patient needs, insight into patient priorities is needed. A systematic literature review, using electronic and manual searches, was made of studies on patient priorities with regard to primary health care. Data-extraction was performed by two researchers, followed by systematic analyses of study features. 57 studies were included. The aspects of care and methods used showed a wide variation. Aspects most often included were "informativeness", "humaneness" and "competence/accuracy". Based on an analysis of 19 studies, the following aspects were seen by patients as most important in more than 50% of the studies that included them: "humaneness", "competence/accuracy", "patients' involvement in decisions", "time for care", "other aspects of availability/accessibility", "informativeness", "exploring patients' needs", "other aspects of relation and communication" and "availability of special services".

摘要

为使医疗保健更能满足患者需求,需要深入了解患者的优先事项。我们通过电子检索和人工检索,对有关初级卫生保健患者优先事项的研究进行了系统的文献综述。由两名研究人员进行数据提取,随后对研究特征进行系统分析。共纳入57项研究。所提供的护理方面和使用的方法差异很大。最常涉及的方面包括“信息性”、“人性化”和“能力/准确性”。基于对19项研究的分析,在纳入这些方面的研究中,超过50%的患者认为以下方面最为重要:“人性化”、“能力/准确性”、“患者参与决策”、“护理时间”、“可及性/便利性的其他方面”、“信息性”、“探究患者需求”、“关系与沟通的其他方面”以及“特殊服务的可及性”。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain.关于全科医疗中患者优先事项的文献系统评价。第1部分:研究领域描述。
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1573-88. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00222-6.
2
Primary care: core values. Patients' priorities.基层医疗:核心价值观。患者的优先事项。
BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):260-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.260.
3
Low-income women's priorities for primary care: a qualitative study.低收入女性的初级保健优先事项:一项定性研究。
J Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;49(2):141-6.
4
Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).患者对全科医疗服务的优先需求:一项国际比较。欧洲全科医疗患者评估特别工作组(EUROPEP)。
Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):4-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.4.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
7
Priority setting in general practice: health priorities of older patients differ from treatment priorities of their physicians.全科医疗中的优先级设定:老年患者的健康优先级与其医生的治疗优先级不同。
Croat Med J. 2010 Dec;51(6):483-92. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2010.51.483.
8
What makes a good general practitioner: do patients and doctors have different views?怎样成为一名优秀的全科医生:患者和医生的看法是否不同?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Dec;47(425):805-9.
9
Priorities in effective management of primary health care institutions in Lithuania: Perspectives of managers of public and private primary health care institutions.立陶宛基层医疗机构有效管理的重点:公立和私立基层医疗机构管理者的观点。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 31;13(12):e0209816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209816. eCollection 2018.
10
Patient and GP agreement on aspects of general practice care.患者与全科医生就全科医疗护理的各个方面达成的共识。
Fam Pract. 2002 Aug;19(4):339-43. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.4.339.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation of the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure to Turkish.《咨询与关系同理心量表》土耳其语版本的改编
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 23;15(6):721. doi: 10.3390/bs15060721.
2
Patient preferences for key organizational features of primary cardiovascular care in Quebec: a discrete choice experiment.魁北克原发性心血管护理关键组织特征的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 10;26(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02810-4.
3
A determination of patient preferences for China online outpatient follow-up clinics by using discrete choice experiment: an exploratory study.
运用离散选择实验确定患者对中国在线门诊随访诊所的偏好:一项探索性研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 24;13:1508369. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1508369. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploring patient perspectives: A qualitative inquiry into healthcare perceptions, experiences and satisfaction in Lebanon.探索患者视角:黎巴嫩医疗保健认知、体验和满意度的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0280665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280665. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient views of the good doctor in primary care: a qualitative study in six provinces in China.患者眼中的基层好医生:中国 6 省份定性研究
Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Jul 11;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00309-y.
6
Feasibility of a Cinematic-Virtual Reality Training Program for Health Professional Students: A Single-Arm Pre-Post Study.医学专业学术文献翻译为简体中文: 健康专业学生影视虚拟现实培训计划的可行性:单臂前后研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1181-1189. doi: 10.1177/19322968231171136. Epub 2023 May 3.
7
Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Rectal Cancer Patients with Clinical Complete Response after Neo-Adjuvant Treatment.为新辅助治疗后达到临床完全缓解的直肠癌患者开发患者决策辅助工具。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;15(3):806. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030806.
8
Patient Perspective in Saudi Arabia: What Qualities Make a Good and Competent Psychiatrist?沙特阿拉伯患者的观点:优秀称职的精神科医生应具备哪些品质?
Cureus. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):e33022. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33022. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Healthcare preferences of the general Chinese population in the hierarchical medical system: A discrete choice experiment.中国一般人群在分级医疗体系下的医疗偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;10:1044550. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1044550. eCollection 2022.
10
Empathy is not so perfect! -For a descriptive and wide conception of empathy.同理心并非十全十美!——描述性与广义同理心概念。
Med Health Care Philos. 2023 Mar;26(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10124-w. Epub 2022 Nov 15.