Suppr超能文献

[在骨科中使用体外冲击波疗法——一项荟萃分析]

[Using extracorporeal shockwave therapy in orthopedics--a meta-analysis].

作者信息

Heller K D, Niethard F U

机构信息

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen.

出版信息

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1998 Sep-Oct;136(5):390-401. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1053674.

Abstract

AIM

Up to now ESWT is not a standard therapeutic technique in orthopaedics. The mechanisms of the induced analgesic effect or the mechanism of shock-waves in bony defects are still unknown. By metaanalysis successrates and indications for ESWT are worked out as well as adequate impulse- and energyrates according to actual state of knowledge. Aim of this study is to rate the published cases.

METHOD

105 papers referring to ESWT of the locomotor system are rated. Validation was performed for each paper according to the international accepted system of the American Association of Spine Surgery in Type A-E. Advise for therapy is taken only from high quality publications of Type A and B. This advise should regard scientific as well as economic aspects.

RESULTS

4825 cases from 55 publications and abstracts that underwent ESWT were evaluated. 24 papers with 1585 cases (33%) live up to the standards of a scientific investigation. Numerous studies exist about therapy of calcifying tendinitis, epicondylitis humeri radialis, painful heel, pseudarthrosis and other enthesiopathies. Especially the studies concerning pseudarthosis and other enthesiopathies do hardly live up to scientific standards. In calcifying tendinitis and painful heel ESWT achieves nearly the same results than the established methods. No serious complications were observed. Because of the high complication rate in operative treatment of heel spur ESWT seems to be justifiable. The techniques of ESWT, energy density levels, impulse rates and complications will be described.

CONCLUSION

The advantages of ESWT are non-invasiveness and low rate of complications. Primary aim should be to evaluate adequate energy density levels and impulse rates for specific groups of indications using high quality studies according to evidence-based-medicine. Long term results need to be awaited to be able to compare ESWT with established methods. Recent inflationary use of ESWT especially in outpatient departments has no scientific indication in numerous cases as conservative methods are not used consequently.

摘要

目的

迄今为止,体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在骨科领域并非标准治疗技术。其诱导镇痛效应的机制或冲击波在骨缺损中的作用机制仍不清楚。通过荟萃分析,根据现有知识确定了ESWT的成功率、适应证以及合适的脉冲率和能量率。本研究的目的是对已发表的病例进行评估。

方法

对105篇关于运动系统ESWT的论文进行评估。根据美国脊柱外科协会国际认可的A-E型系统对每篇论文进行验证。仅从高质量的A类和B类出版物中获取治疗建议。该建议应兼顾科学和经济方面。

结果

对55篇出版物和摘要中接受ESWT治疗的4825例病例进行了评估。24篇论文中的1585例病例(33%)符合科学研究标准。关于钙化性肌腱炎、桡侧肱骨髁上炎、足跟痛、假关节和其他附着点病的治疗有大量研究。特别是关于假关节和其他附着点病的研究几乎不符合科学标准。在钙化性肌腱炎和足跟痛方面,ESWT取得的效果与既定方法几乎相同。未观察到严重并发症。由于跟骨骨刺手术治疗的并发症发生率较高,ESWT似乎是合理的。将描述ESWT的技术、能量密度水平、脉冲率和并发症。

结论

ESWT的优点是无创性和低并发症发生率。首要目标应该是根据循证医学,利用高质量研究为特定适应证组评估合适的能量密度水平和脉冲率。需要等待长期结果才能将ESWT与既定方法进行比较。近期ESWT尤其是在门诊的过度使用在许多情况下没有科学依据,因为没有合理采用保守方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验