Suppr超能文献

心脏听诊检测“奔马律”的准确性及观察者间的一致性。

The accuracy and interobserver agreement in detecting the 'gallop sounds' by cardiac auscultation.

作者信息

Lok C E, Morgan C D, Ranganathan N

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Chest. 1998 Nov;114(5):1283-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.5.1283.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the observer accuracy and interobserver agreement in identifying S4 and S3 by cardiac auscultation and whether they improve with increasing observer experience.

DESIGN

Prospective, blinded study.

SETTING

Cardiology and general internal medicine wards in a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with a cardiac diagnosis and 6 patients without were studied.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Two cardiologists, one general internist, three senior and two junior postgraduate internal medicine trainees, blinded to the patients' characteristics, examined the patients and documented their findings on a questionnaire. Computerized phonocardiogram was obtained in all patients as a gold standard and was interpreted by a blinded, independent cardiologist. The mean positive predictive values for S4 and S3 were 51% (range, 24 to 100%) and 71% (range, 50 to 88%), respectively. The mean negative predictive values for S4 and S3 were 82% (range, 67 to 94%) and 64% (range, 56 to 85%), respectively. The overall interobserver agreements for detecting S4 was K = 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.09) and S3 was K = 0.18 (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.24). There was no apparent trend in the accuracy or interobserver agreement with regard to the level of observer experience.

CONCLUSION

The agreement between observers and the phonocardiographic gold standard in the correct identification of S4 and S3 was poor and the lack of agreement did not appear to be a function of the experience of the observers. The overall interobserver agreement for the detection of either S4 or S3 was little better than chance alone.

摘要

研究目的

通过心脏听诊确定识别S4和S3时观察者的准确性及观察者间的一致性,以及它们是否会随着观察者经验的增加而提高。

设计

前瞻性、盲法研究。

地点

一所大学附属医院的心脏病科和普通内科病房。

患者

研究了40例有心脏诊断的患者和6例无心脏诊断的患者。

测量与结果

两名心脏病专家、一名普通内科医生、三名高级和两名初级内科研究生在对患者特征不知情的情况下对患者进行检查,并将他们的发现记录在一份问卷上。所有患者均获取了计算机化心音图作为金标准,并由一名不知情的独立心脏病专家进行解读。S4和S3的平均阳性预测值分别为51%(范围24%至100%)和71%(范围50%至88%)。S4和S3的平均阴性预测值分别为82%(范围67%至94%)和64%(范围56%至85%)。检测S4时观察者间的总体一致性K = 0.05(95%置信区间[CI],0.01至0.09),检测S3时K = 0.18(95%CI,0.13至0.24)。关于观察者经验水平,在准确性或观察者间一致性方面没有明显趋势。

结论

观察者与心音图金标准在正确识别S4和S3方面的一致性较差,且一致性的缺乏似乎不是观察者经验的作用。检测S出4或S3时观察者间的总体一致性仅略优于随机水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验