Gardner Roy S, Thakur Pramodsingh, Hammill Eric F, Nair Devi G, Eldadah Zayd, Stančák Branislav, Ferrick Kevin, Sriratanasathavorn Charn, Duray Gábor Zoltán, Wariar Ramesh, Zhang Yi, An Qi, Averina Viktoria, Boehmer John P
Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.
Boston Scientific, Arden Hills, MN, USA.
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1571-1581. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13261. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
This study aims to characterize the range of implantable device-based sensor values including heart sounds, markers of ventilation, thoracic impedance, activity, and heart rate for patients with heart failure (HF) when patients were deemed to be in clinically stable periods against the time course of acute decompensation and recovery from HF events.
The MultiSENSE trial followed 900 patients implanted with a COGNIS CRT-D for up to 1 year. Chronic, ambulatory diagnostic sensor data were collected and evaluated during clinically stable periods (CSP: unchanged NYHA classification, no adverse events, and weight change ≤2.27 kg), and in the timeframe leading up to and following HF events (HF admissions or unscheduled visits with intravenous HF treatment). Physiologic sensor data from 1667 CSPs occurring in 676 patients were compared with those data leading up to and following 192 HF events in 106 patients. Overall, the mean age was 66.6 years, and the population were predominantly male (73%). Patients were primarily in NYHA II (67%), with a mean LVEF of 29.6% and median NT-proBNP of 754.5 pg/mL. Sensor values during CSP were poorer in patients who had HF events during the study period than those without HF events, including first heart sound (S1: 2.18 ± 0.84 mG vs. 2.62 ± 0.95 mG, P = 0.002), third heart sound (S3: 1.13 ± 0.36 mG vs. 0.91 ± 0.30 mG, P < 0.001), thoracic impedance (45.66 ± 8.78 Ohm vs. 50.33 ± 8.43 Ohm, P < 0.001), respiratory rate (19.09 ± 3.10 br/min vs. 17.66 ± 2.39 br/min, P = 0.002), night time heart rate (73.39 ± 8.36 b.p.m. vs. 69.56 ± 8.09 b.p.m., P = 0.001), patient activity (1.69 ± 1.84 h vs. 2.56 ± 2.20 h, P = 0.006), and HeartLogic index (11.07 ± 12.14 vs. 5.31 ± 5.13, P = 0.001). Sensor parameters measured worsening status leading up to HF events with recovery of values following treatment.
Device-based physiologic sensors not only revealed progressive worsening leading up to HF events but also differentiated patients at increased risk of HF events when presumed to be clinically stable.
本研究旨在描述心力衰竭(HF)患者在临床稳定期时,基于植入式设备的传感器值范围,包括心音、通气指标、胸阻抗、活动及心率,并观察其随急性失代偿及HF事件恢复时间进程的变化。
多传感器试验对900例植入COGNIS CRT-D的患者进行了长达1年的随访。在临床稳定期(CSP:纽约心脏协会分级不变、无不良事件且体重变化≤2.27 kg)以及HF事件前后的时间段(HF住院或因静脉应用HF治疗而进行的非计划就诊)收集并评估慢性动态诊断传感器数据。将676例患者出现的1667个CSP的生理传感器数据与106例患者发生的192次HF事件前后的数据进行比较。总体而言,平均年龄为66.6岁,研究人群以男性为主(73%)。患者主要处于纽约心脏协会II级(67%),平均左心室射血分数为29.6%,N末端脑钠肽前体中位数为754.5 pg/mL。在研究期间发生HF事件的患者在CSP期间的传感器值比未发生HF事件的患者差,包括第一心音(S1:2.18±0.84 mG对2.62±0.95 mG,P = 0.002)、第三心音(S3:1.13±0.36 mG对0.91±0.30 mG,P < 0.001)、胸阻抗(45.66±8.78欧姆对50.33±8.43欧姆,P < 0.001)、呼吸频率(19.09±3.10次/分钟对17.66±2.39次/分钟,P = 0.002)、夜间心率(73.39±8.36次/分钟对69.56±8.09次/分钟,P = 0.001)、患者活动量(1.69±1.84小时对2.56±2.20小时,P = 0.006)以及心脏逻辑指数(11.07±12.14对5.31±5.13,P = 0.001)。传感器参数在HF事件前显示状态恶化,治疗后值恢复。
基于设备的生理传感器不仅揭示了HF事件前的病情逐渐恶化,还能在假定临床稳定时鉴别出HF事件风险增加的患者。