Boriani G, Biffi M, Capucci A, Botto G L, Broffoni T, Rubino I, Della Casa S, Sanguinetti M, Branzi A, Magnani B
Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Italy.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Nov;21(11 Pt 2):2465-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01202.x.
The efficacy and safety of propafenone as an oral loading dose (600-mg single oral dose) in converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation (< or = 7 days duration) to sinus rhythm were evaluated in a single-blind, placebo-controlled study according to patients' age. Overall, 240 hospitalized patients, NYHA Class < or = 2 without signs or symptoms of heart failure were enrolled: among patients aged < or = 60 years, 55 were allocated to propafenone treatment and 59 to placebo, respectively, and among patients aged > 60 years, 64 were allocated to propafenone treatment and 62 to placebo, respectively.
In each age group, the likelihood of conversion to sinus rhythm was significantly greater after propafenone compared with placebo at 3 and 8 hours. For patients aged < or = 60 years, corresponding odd ratios were 3.78 (95% CI = 1.80-7.92, P = 0.04) at 3 hours and 4.74 (95% CI = 2.12-10.54, P = 0.02) at 8 hours; for patients aged > 60 years odd ratios were 5.03 (95% CI = 2.08-12.12, P = 0.02) at 3 hours and 6.75 (95% CI = 3.28-73.86, P = 0.01) at 8 hours, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that conversion to sinus rhythm within 3 hours was predicted by age < or = 60 years (P = 0.0064) and by propafenone treatment (P < 0.0001), and conversion to sinus rhythm within 8 hours was predicted by age < or = 60 years (P = 0.0467) and by propafenone treatment (P < 0.0001). The occurrence of adverse effects was observed in 14%-16% of propafenone treated patients and in 8% of placebo treated patients without significant differences according to age. In conclusion, in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation without signs of heart failure, propafenone as a single oral loading dose is effective. It is also effective in selected elderly subjects with a favorable safety profile. Moreover, spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm appears to occur less frequently in elderly patients.
在一项单盲、安慰剂对照研究中,根据患者年龄评估了普罗帕酮作为口服负荷剂量(单次口服600毫克)转复近期发作的房颤(持续时间≤7天)为窦性心律的疗效和安全性。总共纳入了240例住院患者,纽约心脏协会心功能分级≤2级且无心力衰竭体征或症状:年龄≤60岁的患者中,分别有55例分配至普罗帕酮治疗组和59例分配至安慰剂组;年龄>60岁的患者中,分别有64例分配至普罗帕酮治疗组和62例分配至安慰剂组。
在每个年龄组中,普罗帕酮治疗后3小时和8小时转复为窦性心律的可能性均显著高于安慰剂组。对于年龄≤60岁的患者,3小时时相应的比值比为3.78(95%置信区间=1.80 - 7.92,P = 0.04),8小时时为4.74(95%置信区间=2.12 - 10.54,P = 0.02);对于年龄>60岁的患者,3小时时比值比为5.03(95%置信区间=2.08 - 12.12,P = 0.02),8小时时为6.75(95%置信区间=3.28 - 73.86,P = 0.01)。逻辑回归分析显示,3小时内转复为窦性心律可由年龄≤60岁(P = 0.0064)和普罗帕酮治疗(P < 0.0001)预测,8小时内转复为窦性心律可由年龄≤60岁(P = 0.0467)和普罗帕酮治疗(P < 0.0001)预测。普罗帕酮治疗组14% - 16%的患者出现不良反应,安慰剂治疗组8%的患者出现不良反应,按年龄无显著差异。总之,在近期发作的无心力衰竭体征的房颤患者中,普罗帕酮单次口服负荷剂量有效。在选定的安全性良好的老年患者中也有效。此外,老年患者自发转复为窦性心律的情况似乎较少见。